From the journal

EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Obligations Apply from 2 August 2026

Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the EU AI Act), imposing transparency obligations on providers and deployers of certain AI systems, becomes binding from 2 August 2026. The obligations cover interactive systems, AI-generated content across text, images, audio, and video, and synthetic media including deepfakes. This deadline was not altered by the AI Omnibus and remains fixed.

2 min read

The transparency obligations in Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 apply from 2 August 2026. This date was not altered by the AI Omnibus and remains fixed. The European Commission published finalised guidelines on the scope and application of Article 50 in July 2026 to support provider and deployer compliance.

Under Article 50(1), providers of AI systems that interact directly with natural persons must make the AI nature of the interaction clear, unless this is obvious from context. Article 50(2) requires providers of generative AI producing text, images, audio, or video to mark outputs in machine-readable format as artificially generated. Article 50(4) requires deployers producing deepfakes to label that content as artificially generated or manipulated.

Chatbot providers, generative image platforms, and AI video tools serving the EU market must implement Article 50 disclosure mechanisms by 2 August 2026. Deployers using AI in advertising, political content, or media production must label synthetic outputs. Non-compliant providers face administrative fines up to EUR 15 million or 3% of global annual turnover, whichever is higher.

A transitional provision applies to the machine-readable marking obligation in Article 50(2) for AI systems placed on the market before 2 August 2026. Providers of those pre-existing systems have until 2 December 2026 to achieve compliance with the marking requirement. The Code of Practice on AI-generated content, currently in development, will provide technical guidance on implementing marking and labelling.

Licentium advises providers and deployers on Article 50 compliance, including disclosure architecture and contractual obligations between AI system providers and deployers. We also advise on regulatory filings with national competent authorities and interaction with the EU AI Office. Work we undertake includes AI Act applicability assessments, Article 50 compliance programmes, GPAI model documentation, and representation before national AI market surveillance authorities.

Source: European Commission, Guidelines on Transparency of AI-Generated Content (Article 50, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), July 2026

AI Regulatory

More from the journal

See all

Hong Kong SFC and FSTB Conclude Consultation on Virtual Asset Advisory and Management Regimes, 26 May 2026

On 26 May 2026, Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission and Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau published consultation conclusions on proposed licensing regimes for virtual asset advisory and management service providers. The regimes apply the same business, same risks, same rules principle and align SFC licensing requirements with those for securities advisory and management businesses. A bill implementing the regimes is planned for introduction into the Legislative Council in 2026.

OCC Grants Circle Final Charter for First National Digital Currency Bank N.A., 9 July 2026

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency granted final approval on 9 July 2026 for Circle Internet Group to establish First National Digital Currency Bank, N.A., operating as Circle National Trust. The bank opened 24 July 2026 under direct OCC oversight and will manage USDC reserves on a directed basis, act as collateral trustee for USDC holders, and provide digital asset custody services to Circle affiliates.

Manitoba Enacts Public Sector AI and Cybersecurity Governance Act June 2026

On 1 June 2026, Bill 51, The Public Sector Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity Governance Act (S.M. 2026, c. 43), received Royal Assent in Manitoba, Canada. The Act mandates transparency, accountability structures, and cybersecurity incident reporting for public sector entities using AI systems. Substantive obligations take effect only through regulations yet to be made.