From the journal

Washington DFI and 34 Regulators Enter Coinme Consent Order, United States, 8 October 2026

The Washington State Department of Financial Institutions announced on 8 October 2026 that it had entered a multistate consent order with Coinme, Inc., a Seattle money transmitter and crypto kiosk operator, joined by 34 other state regulators. Coinme pays 2.5 million dollars in administrative penalty fees and costs, shuts down its crypto kiosks by the end of 2026, and commissions an independent review of its Bank Secrecy Act and anti money laundering programme.

2 min read

The Washington State Department of Financial Institutions entered a consent order with Coinme, Inc. on 8 October 2026, joined by 34 other state regulators. Washington, Ohio, Georgia, Arkansas, North Carolina, Alaska and Illinois led the action. The order resolves a statement of charges the Department issued against Coinme in 2025 together with examination findings, and it closes the matter rather than opening a contested stage.

The Department records the action under Washington's Uniform Money Services Act, the act named in its enforcement listing for Coinme. Three findings are stated: failure to meet state net worth requirements, poor accounting practice, and a deficient Bank Secrecy Act and anti money laundering programme covering the crypto kiosks.

Coinme pays 2.5 million dollars in administrative penalty fees and costs and must close its crypto kiosks by the end of 2026. It must commission an independent compliance review of its Bank Secrecy Act and anti money laundering programme and correct every issue that review identifies. Kiosk operators licensed across the 35 participating states now face a settled regulator position that net worth shortfalls and weak transaction monitoring at kiosk networks draw coordinated multistate action rather than single state orders.

The announcement sets no calendar date for the independent review or for the remediation that follows it, and describes the 2.5 million dollars as penalty fees and costs rather than consumer restitution. The kiosk wind down deadline is the end of 2026.

Licentium advises money transmitters, crypto kiosk operators and payment firms on United States state licensing and financial crime compliance. Work we undertake includes multistate licence reviews, net worth and surety planning, Bank Secrecy Act programme assessments and responses to state enforcement actions.

Source: Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, Washington State DFI Enters Multi-State Consent Order with Coinme, Inc., 8 October 2026

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

A 2026 guide to company jurisdictions for heavy data processing

A company that collects and analyses personal data at scale faces three separate tests when it chooses where to incorporate. They are the data protection law that binds a company formed there, the international lists that banks and counterparties screen against, and the cost of forming, running and banking the company. This guide applies those tests to 24 jurisdictions in Asia, the Middle East, the Atlantic and Caribbean, the Pacific and West Africa. Every jurisdiction here without a private-sector data protection law in force has thin banking, currency controls or both.

Bafin imposes fine on Nomura Holdings Inc. for WpHG breach

On 15 October 2026, Bafin fined Nomura Holdings Inc. €320,000 for failing to submit voting rights notifications during UniCredit S.p.A.’s takeover bid for Commerzbank AG in May and June 2026.

South African validators supplying crypto staking services to an Irish custodian

A hypothetical South African validator business wants to operate Ethereum infrastructure for an Irish crypto-asset service provider (CASP) authorised to hold customers' cryptoassets. The proposed contract leaves customer relationships and withdrawal credentials with the Irish custodian. The service can be structured as technical outsourcing, but the custodian must retain effective asset control and the signing system must enforce the supplier's limited role. Customer compensation after a validation failure remains a separate question from the supplier's contractual liability.