From the journal

Taiwan FSC Consults on Agentic AI Security in Financial Services, 13 October 2026

Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission published a consultation document on 13 October 2026 on the secure use of agentic AI in the financial sector, opening a 30 day comment period. The paper grades each use case on data sensitivity, the impact of the actions the system takes, and capability boundaries, with the highest of the three scores setting the overall tier. That tier then drives approval thresholds, pilot conditions, control depth, supervision and audit.

2 min read

Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission released a consultation document on the secure use of agentic AI by financial institutions on 13 October 2026. The paper is open for comment for 30 days through the Join Talk section of the government public policy participation platform and through the Commission's public mailbox. It is a consultation step rather than a binding instrument, and the Commission has said the responses will feed later policy, guidance and supervisory dialogue.

The paper states that it does not replace existing law, supervisory rules, outsourcing management requirements or internal control obligations, and that it sits alongside them. Its security chapter applies zero trust principles and draws on international security standards. The Commission describes agentic AI as systems that plan steps, call tools and reach data across systems, separating them from chat style models that mainly generate replies.

Banks, insurers and securities firms supervised by the Commission are asked to grade each agentic AI use case on three axes: the sensitivity of the data reached, the impact of the actions the system can take, and capability boundaries together with the scope for spread. The highest score on any one axis sets the overall rating. That rating governs approval thresholds, whether a pilot or a full launch is permitted, the depth of controls, and the supervision and audit applied, and it is reassessed over the life of the deployment.

The Commission has asked respondents not to argue for particular models, products, vendors or single technical architectures, and to address applicable use cases, risk levels, practical limits, alternatives, maturity, resource needs, integration with existing systems and verifiable control effects. The comment period runs for 30 days from 13 October 2026. Questions go to the Commission's Information Service Department.

Licentium advises banks, insurers, payment firms and technology vendors on AI governance and financial services supervision in Asia Pacific and Europe. Work we undertake includes AI use case risk classification, control design against supervisory expectations, outsourcing and vendor contract review, and drafting consultation responses.

Source: Financial Supervisory Commission, press release on the consultation document for the use of agentic AI in the financial industry, 13 October 2026

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

A 2026 guide to company jurisdictions for heavy data processing

A company that collects and analyses personal data at scale faces three separate tests when it chooses where to incorporate. They are the data protection law that binds a company formed there, the international lists that banks and counterparties screen against, and the cost of forming, running and banking the company. This guide applies those tests to 24 jurisdictions in Asia, the Middle East, the Atlantic and Caribbean, the Pacific and West Africa. Every jurisdiction here without a private-sector data protection law in force has thin banking, currency controls or both.

Bafin imposes fine on Nomura Holdings Inc. for WpHG breach

On 15 October 2026, Bafin fined Nomura Holdings Inc. €320,000 for failing to submit voting rights notifications during UniCredit S.p.A.’s takeover bid for Commerzbank AG in May and June 2026.

South African validators supplying crypto staking services to an Irish custodian

A hypothetical South African validator business wants to operate Ethereum infrastructure for an Irish crypto-asset service provider (CASP) authorised to hold customers' cryptoassets. The proposed contract leaves customer relationships and withdrawal credentials with the Irish custodian. The service can be structured as technical outsourcing, but the custodian must retain effective asset control and the signing system must enforce the supplier's limited role. Customer compensation after a validation failure remains a separate question from the supplier's contractual liability.