From the journal

European Commission establishes AI Office to enforce AI Act

The European AI Office has been established to support the AI Act's implementation, focusing on general-purpose AI compliance and fostering trustworthy AI across the EU.

1 min read

The European AI Office was established within the European Commission on an unspecified date to support the development and implementation of the AI Act, particularly for general-purpose AI. The office will enforce compliance with the AI Act and provide legal certainty for businesses.

The AI Office operates under the powers granted by the AI Act, which includes the ability to conduct evaluations of general-purpose AI models, request information from model providers, and apply sanctions for non-compliance.

The AI Office applies to all regulated entities involved in AI, including businesses and model providers within the EU. It aims to foster an ecosystem of trustworthy AI and enhance AI adoption and innovation.

The office is recruiting for various positions, with applications due by 8 September 2026. This recruitment may impact its capacity to meet compliance obligations as the enforcement team expands.

The AI Office will oversee initiatives like the AI Continent action plan and the Apply AI Strategy, which aim to boost economic growth and competitiveness in strategic sectors across the EU.

Source: AI Office / EC, official publication, retrieved 2026-08-11

AI Regulatory

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

MLR Registration and the FCA Cryptoasset Gateway to 25 October 2027

This matter concerns the transition of a United Kingdom cryptoasset business from FCA registration under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 to Part 4A permission under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. The question is whether MLR registration gives conversion, grandfathering, priority, or a right to continue after 25 October 2027, and what an affected firm should do before the gateway closes. This analysis assumes an existing UK-facing cryptoasset business, no relevant Part 4A permission, and an intention to continue after commencement.

Illia Prokopiev

Matched-Category Analysis of the Hong Kong Stablecoin Issuer Route and the Singapore Digital Payment Token Service Route

This matter concerns whether current licensing data supports a commercial comparison between Hong Kong’s stablecoin issuer route and Singapore’s digital payment token service route. The question is whether the proposition remains legally accurate as of 12 August 2026. “Commercially useful” is assumed to mean useful for selecting a market-entry and operating model, not proof that either regulator is more permissive.

Illia Prokopiev

ESMA's 2026 Custody Resilience CSA and the Rules That Actually Bind

ESMA’s 2026 Common Supervisory Action is a coordinated national review of digital operational resilience in crypto-asset custody. It will test whether selected crypto-asset service providers can demonstrate effective controls across six announced workstreams. The legal questions are which requirements are binding, how national competent authorities may assess control effectiveness, and what consequences may follow from a deficiency. This analysis assumes that the firm is permitted under MiCA Article 59 to provide custody and administration within Article 3(1)(17).