From the journal

US Senate Files Cloture on Digital Asset Market Clarity Act in August 2026

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) filed cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 3633, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, initiating the procedural step toward a Senate floor vote on the primary US crypto market structure bill. H.R. 3633, passed by the House in 2025 and reported by the Senate Banking Committee on 1 June 2026, would assign the Commodity Futures Trading Commission primary authority over digital commodities while preserving SEC jurisdiction over primary market token transactions.

2 min read

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) filed cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 3633, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, advancing the bill toward a Senate floor vote. H.R. 3633 passed the House of Representatives in 2025 and was reported by the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on 1 June 2026. Cloture on the motion to proceed is a procedural step under Senate Rule XXII that requires 60 votes to invoke and, if successful, limits debate to 30 hours before a vote on whether to proceed to the bill.

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act would amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq.) to create a statutory classification system for digital assets. Assets deemed digital commodities would fall under CFTC jurisdiction; assets representing securities interests in issuers would remain under SEC jurisdiction. The bill introduces a new category of CFTC-licensed digital commodity exchange and sets out capital, custody, and disclosure requirements for registered intermediaries. The SEC and CFTC published joint guidance on 17 March 2026 clarifying the application of existing federal securities and commodity laws to crypto assets pending enactment.

If enacted, the Act would directly affect crypto asset exchanges, custodians, broker-dealers, and protocol developers operating in the United States. Entities currently offering digital commodity trading without a CFTC licence would need to register as digital commodity exchanges or digital commodity brokers. Custodians holding customer digital commodity assets would face segregation and insurance requirements analogous to those applicable to futures commission merchants. DeFi protocol operators would face disclosure obligations when their protocols transact US persons in assets classified as digital commodities.

The cloture vote outcome is not certain. Sixty votes are required to proceed; the Republican caucus holds 53 seats, requiring at least seven Democratic votes to advance the bill. The CFTC has stated it will advance crypto-sector rulemaking under existing Commodity Exchange Act authority regardless of the bill's outcome. No enactment date has been set.

Licentium advises crypto exchanges, custodians, and protocol developers on US and international digital asset regulatory strategy. Work we undertake includes digital commodity exchange registration analysis, CFTC and SEC regulatory mapping for token classification, DeFi compliance programme design, and cross-border digital asset regulatory strategy.

Source: H.R. 3633, Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, 119th Congress (2025-2026), Congress.gov

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

MLR Registration and the FCA Cryptoasset Gateway to 25 October 2027

This matter concerns the transition of a United Kingdom cryptoasset business from FCA registration under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 to Part 4A permission under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. The question is whether MLR registration gives conversion, grandfathering, priority, or a right to continue after 25 October 2027, and what an affected firm should do before the gateway closes. This analysis assumes an existing UK-facing cryptoasset business, no relevant Part 4A permission, and an intention to continue after commencement.

Illia Prokopiev

ESMA's 2026 Custody Resilience CSA and the Rules That Actually Bind

ESMA’s 2026 Common Supervisory Action is a coordinated national review of digital operational resilience in crypto-asset custody. It will test whether selected crypto-asset service providers can demonstrate effective controls across six announced workstreams. The legal questions are which requirements are binding, how national competent authorities may assess control effectiveness, and what consequences may follow from a deficiency. This analysis assumes that the firm is permitted under MiCA Article 59 to provide custody and administration within Article 3(1)(17).

Illia Prokopiev

Stablecoin regulation in the US, Hong Kong and Singapore

Stablecoin and digital-token regulation now combines market-entry authorization with continuous financial-crime controls in daily operations. The question is whether the United States’ proposed payment-stablecoin customer identification program, Hong Kong’s narrow first licensing round, and Singapore’s digital payment token (DPT) directory support a bank-like compliance characterization. They do, with material limits. The more accurate proposition is that compliance is moving beyond approval into continuous financial-institution-grade operations.