From the journal

Nigeria Revenue Service Releases Virtual Asset Taxation Guidelines on 31 July 2026

On 31 July 2026, the Nigeria Revenue Service released Information Circular No. 2026/21, establishing mandatory tax treatment for cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, non-fungible tokens, and decentralised finance transactions. The circular imposes a 7.5% value added tax on virtual asset services, 1.5% stamp duty on token conversions, and income tax on disposal gains and staking or mining rewards. The measures align with the Nigeria Tax Act, 2025 and the Nigeria Tax Administration Act, 2025.

2 min read

The Nigeria Revenue Service issued Information Circular No. 2026/21 on 31 July 2026 as administrative guidance under the Nigeria Tax Act, 2025 and the Nigeria Tax Administration Act, 2025. The circular is in force from the date of issue. It establishes mandatory tax treatment for all virtual asset activities conducted by persons and entities within Nigerian tax jurisdiction and is addressed to Virtual Asset Service Providers, peer-to-peer marketplace operators, tax practitioners, and individual investors.

The circular designates three tax instruments. First, virtual asset services attract value added tax at the standard rate of 7.5% under section 4 of the Nigeria Tax Act, 2025. Second, token conversions attract stamp duty at 1.5% under the Stamp Duties Act as amended by the Finance Act, 2020. Third, disposal gains on cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and tokenised securities, and income from mining rewards and staking rewards, are subject to income tax at the rates specified in the Nigeria Tax Act, 2025. All virtual assets must be valued at the prevailing market price on an NRS-approved exchange at the time the transaction occurs.

The circular binds four categories of market participants. Virtual Asset Service Providers registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission of Nigeria must file periodic tax reports and withhold applicable taxes on transactions facilitated through their platforms. Peer-to-peer marketplace operators must collect stamp duty on token conversions. Individual investors must report disposal gains in annual income tax returns. Non-fungible token creators and decentralised finance protocol participants are expressly included within scope; gains from NFT sales and returns from DeFi liquidity provision attract income tax.

The circular does not specify an effective date separate from the date of issue, leaving unresolved whether virtual asset activities conducted before 31 July 2026 but reported or assessed after that date fall within its scope. Registration and record-keeping requirements imposed on VASPs apply immediately. The NRS has not published a separate compliance timetable or transitional provisions.

Licentium advises virtual asset businesses and investors with operations or customer bases in African markets on tax structuring and regulatory compliance. Work we undertake includes VASP licensing and registration, tax reporting obligation assessments, cross-border token transaction structuring, and regulatory engagement with the Nigeria Revenue Service and the Securities and Exchange Commission of Nigeria.

Source: Nigeria Revenue Service, Information Circular No. 2026/21: Guidelines on the Taxation of Virtual Assets, 31 July 2026

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

MLR Registration and the FCA Cryptoasset Gateway to 25 October 2027

This matter concerns the transition of a United Kingdom cryptoasset business from FCA registration under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 to Part 4A permission under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. The question is whether MLR registration gives conversion, grandfathering, priority, or a right to continue after 25 October 2027, and what an affected firm should do before the gateway closes. This analysis assumes an existing UK-facing cryptoasset business, no relevant Part 4A permission, and an intention to continue after commencement.

Illia Prokopiev

ESMA's 2026 Custody Resilience CSA and the Rules That Actually Bind

ESMA’s 2026 Common Supervisory Action is a coordinated national review of digital operational resilience in crypto-asset custody. It will test whether selected crypto-asset service providers can demonstrate effective controls across six announced workstreams. The legal questions are which requirements are binding, how national competent authorities may assess control effectiveness, and what consequences may follow from a deficiency. This analysis assumes that the firm is permitted under MiCA Article 59 to provide custody and administration within Article 3(1)(17).

Illia Prokopiev

Stablecoin regulation in the US, Hong Kong and Singapore

Stablecoin and digital-token regulation now combines market-entry authorization with continuous financial-crime controls in daily operations. The question is whether the United States’ proposed payment-stablecoin customer identification program, Hong Kong’s narrow first licensing round, and Singapore’s digital payment token (DPT) directory support a bank-like compliance characterization. They do, with material limits. The more accurate proposition is that compliance is moving beyond approval into continuous financial-institution-grade operations.