From the journal

EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Obligations Apply from 2 August 2026

Starting 2 August 2026, providers and deployers of AI systems that interact with users, generate synthetic content, or use biometric categorisation must comply with the transparency obligations set out in Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. The European Commission published companion guidelines on 20 July 2026 to assist market participants with compliance. A grace period to 2 December 2026 applies to machine-readable marking for generative AI systems already on the market before that date.

3 min read

Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the EU AI Act, entered into application on 2 August 2026. The obligations are binding across all EU Member States without transposition. The date follows the staggered entry-into-force schedule under Article 113 of the Act, under which the majority of provisions apply from 2 August 2026 and the prohibitions on unacceptable-risk AI systems applied from 2 February 2025.

Article 50 imposes four categories of disclosure duty. Article 50(1) requires providers of AI systems intended to interact directly with humans to ensure those systems identify themselves as AI to users. Article 50(2) requires providers of AI systems generating synthetic audio, image, video or text to mark those outputs in a machine-readable format. Article 50(3) requires deployers using emotion recognition or biometric categorisation systems to inform natural persons exposed to that processing. Article 50(4) requires deployers of deepfake or AI-generated content on matters of public interest to disclose the artificial origin of that content. The European Commission published guidelines on 20 July 2026 to assist with implementation. The AI Omnibus provisional agreement of May 2026 provides that AI systems already on the market before 2 August 2026 that generate synthetic content have until 2 December 2026 to meet the machine-readable marking obligation under Article 50(2).

Providers of chatbots, voice assistants, and text-generation APIs serving EU users must now include AI identification disclosures in their user interfaces. Developers of text-to-image, text-to-video, and large language model applications must implement machine-readable watermarking or equivalent marking schemes, subject to the December 2026 grace period for pre-existing systems. Media publishers and advertising platforms that deploy AI-generated content addressing matters of public interest must label that content at the point of publication. Operators using emotion recognition systems in hiring or customer service, and those using biometric categorisation in their operations, must deliver prior disclosure to the individuals whose data is processed.

Article 2(3) excludes AI systems used exclusively for national security, defence, or law enforcement by or on behalf of a Member State authority from the Article 50 obligations. Content forming part of clearly artistic, creative, or satirical works is exempt from the deepfake labelling duty under Article 50(4). Providers of general-purpose AI models that supply foundation model outputs to downstream deployers may discharge their Article 50(2) marking obligations if they implement marking at model level and communicate the method to deployers who then comply at deployment level. The deadline for compliance with machine-readable marking for in-market systems under the AI Omnibus grace period is 2 December 2026.

Licentium advises clients on EU AI Act compliance and may assist directly or through its partner network. Providers, deployers, and enterprises affected by Article 50 obligations are welcome to contact us to discuss their compliance position. Work we undertake includes EU AI Act obligations assessments, transparency disclosure documentation, AI output marking implementation review, vendor due diligence for AI systems, and AI governance policy drafting.

Source: European Commission, Guidelines on Transparency Obligations for Providers and Deployers of AI Systems, 20 July 2026

More from the journal

See all

Hong Kong SFC and FSTB Conclude Consultation on Virtual Asset Advisory and Management Regimes, 26 May 2026

On 26 May 2026, Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission and Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau published consultation conclusions on proposed licensing regimes for virtual asset advisory and management service providers. The regimes apply the same business, same risks, same rules principle and align SFC licensing requirements with those for securities advisory and management businesses. A bill implementing the regimes is planned for introduction into the Legislative Council in 2026.

OCC Grants Circle Final Charter for First National Digital Currency Bank N.A., 9 July 2026

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency granted final approval on 9 July 2026 for Circle Internet Group to establish First National Digital Currency Bank, N.A., operating as Circle National Trust. The bank opened 24 July 2026 under direct OCC oversight and will manage USDC reserves on a directed basis, act as collateral trustee for USDC holders, and provide digital asset custody services to Circle affiliates.

Manitoba Enacts Public Sector AI and Cybersecurity Governance Act June 2026

On 1 June 2026, Bill 51, The Public Sector Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity Governance Act (S.M. 2026, c. 43), received Royal Assent in Manitoba, Canada. The Act mandates transparency, accountability structures, and cybersecurity incident reporting for public sector entities using AI systems. Substantive obligations take effect only through regulations yet to be made.