From the journal

ESMA Issues New Q&As on MiCA for Crypto-Asset Service Providers

ESMA has published new questions and answers regarding MiCA's application to crypto-asset service providers, clarifying compliance obligations for lending services and advisory practices.

1 min read

ESMA published new questions and answers on October 17, 2023, regarding the application of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) to crypto-asset service providers (CASPs). The document clarifies the conditions under which CASPs can offer lending services involving clients' crypto-assets and how their advisory practices align with existing investment advice regulations under MiFID II.

The guidance relies on the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), specifically addressing compliance obligations for CASPs. It highlights the need for CASPs to understand their regulatory expectations when providing lending services and investment advice related to crypto-assets.

The new Q&As apply specifically to crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) operating under the MiCA framework. These clarifications are essential for CASPs to navigate their compliance obligations effectively.

The material does not specify a deadline for compliance or any transitional period. CASPs are encouraged to review the new Q&As and assess their current practices against the clarified regulatory expectations.

The guidance aims to assist CASPs in aligning their lending services and advisory practices with the clarified regulatory expectations under MiCA and MiFID II. Compliance teams should take immediate action to ensure adherence to these new guidelines.

Source: ESMA, official publication, retrieved 2026-08-11

Crypto Regulatory

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

MLR Registration and the FCA Cryptoasset Gateway to 25 October 2027

This matter concerns the transition of a United Kingdom cryptoasset business from FCA registration under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 to Part 4A permission under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. The question is whether MLR registration gives conversion, grandfathering, priority, or a right to continue after 25 October 2027, and what an affected firm should do before the gateway closes. This analysis assumes an existing UK-facing cryptoasset business, no relevant Part 4A permission, and an intention to continue after commencement.

Illia Prokopiev

ESMA's 2026 Custody Resilience CSA and the Rules That Actually Bind

ESMA’s 2026 Common Supervisory Action is a coordinated national review of digital operational resilience in crypto-asset custody. It will test whether selected crypto-asset service providers can demonstrate effective controls across six announced workstreams. The legal questions are which requirements are binding, how national competent authorities may assess control effectiveness, and what consequences may follow from a deficiency. This analysis assumes that the firm is permitted under MiCA Article 59 to provide custody and administration within Article 3(1)(17).

Illia Prokopiev

Stablecoin regulation in the US, Hong Kong and Singapore

Stablecoin and digital-token regulation now combines market-entry authorization with continuous financial-crime controls in daily operations. The question is whether the United States’ proposed payment-stablecoin customer identification program, Hong Kong’s narrow first licensing round, and Singapore’s digital payment token (DPT) directory support a bank-like compliance characterization. They do, with material limits. The more accurate proposition is that compliance is moving beyond approval into continuous financial-institution-grade operations.