From the journal

Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets updates requirements for crypto service providers

As of 23 October 2026, crypto service providers must include invoice details for assessment fees in their application forms.

1 min read

The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) announced a new requirement effective 23 October 2026. All application forms for fit and proper assessments must include invoice details for the assessment fee.

This requirement is part of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR), which governs the licensing of crypto-asset service providers (CASPs).

The new requirement applies specifically to crypto service providers seeking to operate under MiCAR regulations.

Failure to comply with this requirement by the deadline may result in delays in obtaining necessary assessments.

Source: DNB, official publication, retrieved 2026-10-27

Crypto Regulatory

More from the journal

See all

Software escrow for South African AI supplied to an Irish bank

A Cape Town AI supplier offers source-code escrow to an Irish bank that depends on its fraud-alert service. The bank needs a way to continue operating after supplier failure, but the software also depends on licensed model technology and cloud services. A workable arrangement requires a recoverable deployment, permission to operate it and an alternative when a necessary dependency cannot survive the supplier.

AI debt collection from India and the UK authorisation boundary

A Pune company supplies an AI debt collection system to a UK consumer-credit lender authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The system drafts reminders, schedules contacts and proposes repayment options, while the lender approves customer communications and decides forbearance. The supplier wants a later version to contact borrowers and negotiate within lender-set limits. The recommended first release keeps collection activity with the lender; the supplier-operated version needs a different permission and operating structure.

Crypto Travel Rule failures between a Brazilian provider and an Irish CASP

A Brazilian virtual-asset provider wants to transfer business customers' crypto-assets to an Irish crypto-asset service provider, or CASP. The assets reach the receiving address with incomplete originator information and a legal-entity name that does not match the recipient account. The sender demands immediate release because the blockchain transfer is final. The Irish receiver should hold customer availability while it resolves the identities and missing data, then make a documented release or return decision.