From the journal

Delaware Enacts Stablecoin Modernization Package Aligning State Licensing with Federal GENIUS Act

Delaware Governor Matt Meyer signed the Banking, Money Transmission, and Stablecoin Modernization Package on 6 July 2026, creating a state licensing regime for payment stablecoin issuers under the Delaware Payment Stablecoin Act. Senate Bill 19 establishes reserve requirements, redemption standards, and capital obligations aligned with the federal GENIUS Act and directs the Commissioner of Banks to seek nationwide operating authority through a substantial-similarity certification.

3 min read

On 6 July 2026, Delaware Governor Matt Meyer signed a three-bill package into law: Senate Bill 16, Senate Bill 19, and an accompanying banking modernisation bill. Senate Bill 19, the Delaware Payment Stablecoin Act, is final. It establishes a new licensing and supervisory structure for payment stablecoin issuers under Title 5 of the Delaware Code, enacted in parallel with the federal Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act, Pub. L. 119-27, and implementing rules proposed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency under Docket ID OCC-2025-0372.

The Delaware Payment Stablecoin Act requires payment stablecoin issuers to maintain eligible reserves at least equal to the face value of outstanding stablecoins, redeem stablecoins within two business days of a valid request, meet capital standards, and comply with AML and Bank Secrecy Act obligations. Additional requirements include monthly reserve reports independently examined by an accounting firm, custody safeguards, change-of-control notice procedures, and a federal-to-state charter conversion pathway. The Act directs the Commissioner of Banks to file a substantial-similarity certification application under the GENIUS Act within six months after OCC implementing regulations are promulgated; certification would allow Delaware-licensed issuers to operate nationwide without a separate federal charter.

Payment stablecoin issuers licensed in Delaware may serve customers across all U.S. states without a separate federal charter once the substantial-similarity certification is obtained. Existing money-transmitter licensees and virtual currency businesses in Delaware must assess whether their activities fall within the new stablecoin licensing definition. Banks seeking to issue payment stablecoins must comply with both the Delaware Act and applicable OCC implementing rules.

The substantial-similarity certification mechanism under the GENIUS Act does not become available until after the OCC finalises its implementing rules; the OCC comment period closed on 24 July 2026. Delaware's certification filing therefore depends on federal timelines outside the state's control. Senate Bill 16 modernises money-transmission licensing in parallel; operators transmitting both fiat currency and virtual currency must assess their obligations under both statutes.

Licentium advises payment stablecoin issuers, digital asset firms, and financial institutions on U.S. state and federal licensing strategy, including Delaware stablecoin licensing, GENIUS Act compliance, and reserve structure design through a partner network. Contact us to discuss state licensing applications or the interaction between federal and state stablecoin regimes. Work we undertake includes licensing applications, reserve requirement structuring, BSA and AML compliance programmes, OCC rulemaking monitoring, and nationwide market-entry strategy.

Source: Delaware General Assembly, Senate Bill 19, Delaware Payment Stablecoin Act, enacted 6 July 2026

Crypto Regulatory

More from the journal

See all

Earned wage access regulation for a Philippine app entering the UK

A hypothetical Philippine fintech supplies an app through which UK employees request part of their accrued net wages before payday. Employers provide time-worked and payroll data, and the next payroll run reconciles payments and charges. Which arrangements remain a payroll feature, which create regulated credit or payment services, and which structure should the company launch? The proposed first employer is in England and Wales; the financial-services analysis addresses UK entry, with Philippine obligations assessed separately by activity.

EU Digital Identity Wallet KYC through a UAE fintech app

A UAE technology company plans to use credentials from European Digital Identity Wallets when customers apply for accounts supplied by an EU financial institution. This hypothetical uses a mainland Dubai company, a German-authorised electronic-money institution and an initial service for adults resident in Germany. Three variants are compared: the institution requests credentials and returns a result, the UAE firm seeks its own relying-party status, or an identity vendor verifies for both organisations. The account provider retains its onboarding responsibility in each arrangement.

CARF crypto reporting and DAC8 crypto duties for one international platform

A UK-based crypto group serves customers resident in the European Union and Brazil through one app and several affiliated companies. This hypothetical case study follows the group’s 2026 reporting decisions under the EU’s DAC8 rules, national CARF implementation and Brazil’s DeCripto requirements. The central question is which legal entity must collect information and report each activity, and when a filing can discharge another obligation.