From the journal

UK Designates 18 Cryptocurrency Exchanges Under Russia Sanctions Regulations, 26 May 2026

On 26 May 2026, the UK designated 18 cryptocurrency exchanges under The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, including Huobi Global S.A., operator of HTX, and three Georgian Russia-focused exchanges. OFSI confirmed HTX is subject to UK financial sanctions by reason of Huobi's ownership. The action marks the first time the UK has directly sanctioned cryptocurrency exchanges in connection with Russian sanctions evasion.

3 min read

On 26 May 2026, the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office published the Russia Sanctions Notice of 26 May 2026, designating 18 cryptocurrency exchanges under The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (S.I. 2019/855). The designations are enforcement-stage measures; affected entities are immediately subject to UK asset freeze obligations and a prohibition on making funds or economic resources available to them. This is the first UK sanctions package to target cryptocurrency exchanges directly under the Russia regime.

The legal basis for the designations is Regulation 6 of S.I. 2019/855, which permits designation of persons involved in destabilising Ukraine or undermining its territorial integrity, sovereignty, or independence. The designated entities include HUOBI GLOBAL S.A., the registered operator of the HTX exchange; OFSI confirmed in updated guidance that HTX is subject to UK financial sanctions by reason of its Huobi ownership. Three Georgian-registered companies operating Russia-focused exchanges were also designated on the basis of involvement in the A7 network, a Russia-linked procurement and financial infrastructure used to channel funds to Russian state entities.

UK-based banks, payment service providers, and FCA-registered cryptoasset businesses must update counterparty screening lists against the UK Sanctions List as amended on 26 May 2026. Any person who makes funds or economic resources available to a designated person without an OFSI licence commits an offence under Regulation 13A of S.I. 2019/855. Firms with existing settlement positions, exchange relationships, or custody arrangements involving HTX or associated Huobi entities must obtain specific legal advice on whether ongoing performance constitutes a prohibited dealing and whether an OFSI specific licence under Regulation 64 is required.

OFSI has not published a general licence covering pre-existing exchange-to-exchange settlement obligations, leaving counterparties to apply for specific licences under Regulation 64 of S.I. 2019/855. The UK Government stated the A7 network was responsible for channelling over USD 1.5 billion into Russian state entities, and further designation rounds targeting related infrastructure remain possible. Counterparties in third countries that provide services to designated exchanges without a relevant licence may themselves become subject to secondary designation consideration.

Licentium advises cryptoasset businesses, payment institutions, and financial intermediaries on UK and EU financial sanctions compliance, OFSI licensing, and counterparty screening obligations. We may advise on this matter or refer you to our partner network for sanctions counsel. Work we undertake includes sanctions risk assessments, OFSI licence applications, FCA cryptoasset registration compliance, and cross-jurisdictional sanctions gap analysis.

Source: UK Government, UK targets sanctions circumvention and crypto networks exploited by Russia, 26 May 2026

Crypto Regulatory

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

Hawala and Underground Banking in FATF’s 2026 Report

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) published a September 2026 report on professional money laundering through underground banking, hawala and other similar service providers (HOSSPs). The questions are what its findings establish, how they relate to FATF standards, and what responses they support. No domestic jurisdiction, transaction or enforcement proceeding has been specified. The analysis addresses international standards and attributed country examples; it does not determine liability or operational duties under an unidentified national law.

China's Supreme People's Court Issues AI Dispute Adjudication Opinions, 7 September 2026

The Supreme People's Court of China issued the Opinions on Lawfully Adjudicating Disputes Involving Artificial Intelligence, Fafa [2026] No. 10, on 7 September 2026. The document runs to 24 articles across five parts and directs courts nationwide on infringement liability, intellectual property, procedural rules and criminal matters arising from the use of AI. It is the first national judicial guidance of its kind in China.

California CCPA Automated Decisionmaking Rules Bind Businesses from 1 January 2027

The California Privacy Protection Agency regulations on automated decisionmaking technology were approved by the Office of Administrative Law on 22 September 2025 and took effect on 1 January 2026. A business that uses automated decisionmaking technology to make significant decisions about consumers must comply from 1 January 2027. The same rulemaking sets staged deadlines for cybersecurity audits and for risk assessment reporting to the Agency.