From the journal

European Commission Opens Consultation on MiCA Review, May 2026

On 20 May 2026, the European Commission opened a targeted consultation under Articles 140 and 142 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (MiCA) to assess whether the regulation requires amendment. The consultation invites responses from crypto-asset service providers, token issuers, exchanges, and national competent authorities on whether MiCA remains fit for purpose given evolving market conditions and international developments since its full application in December 2024.

3 min read

On 20 May 2026, the European Commission launched a targeted consultation on the functioning of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), Regulation (EU) 2023/1114. The consultation is at the assessment stage: the Commission is gathering input to inform the mandatory review report under Articles 140 and 142 of MiCA, and that report may, if warranted, be accompanied by a legislative proposal to amend the regulation. No proposal has been tabled; the current exercise is consultative.

Articles 140 and 142 of MiCA require the European Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the application of the regulation and developments in crypto-asset markets, together with a legislative proposal if the Commission determines one is needed. MiCA became fully applicable on 30 December 2024, establishing licensing requirements for crypto-asset service providers (CASPs), issuers of asset-referenced tokens, and issuers of e-money tokens. The consultation examines whether the scope, obligations, and supervisory architecture of MiCA remain adequate in light of market developments and changes in the international regulatory environment, particularly in the United States.

Crypto-asset service providers holding MiCA licences, applicants in the authorisation pipeline, asset-referenced token issuers, and e-money token issuers all face exposure to potential rule changes if the Commission proceeds to a legislative proposal. Areas under scrutiny include custody obligations, conflict-of-interest controls, the treatment of decentralised protocols, and whether AI-driven trading systems require explicit classification. Entities that submit consultation responses have the opportunity to shape the scope and design of any amendment before a formal proposal is tabled.

The Commission has not set a timetable for a legislative proposal, and the review report is the only obligatory output under MiCA. Key open questions include whether the exclusion of fully decentralised crypto-assets will be revised, how non-fungible tokens with financial characteristics will be classified, and whether international equivalence determinations will be adjusted following regulatory changes in the United States. Consultation responses will be published and form part of the record supporting any subsequent legislative impact assessment.

Licentium advises crypto-asset service providers and token issuers on MiCA compliance and may assist with consultation submissions and regulatory positioning ahead of any legislative proposal. Entities wishing to participate in the consultation or assess their exposure to potential amendments are welcome to reach out. Work we undertake includes MiCA licensing, CASP authorisation, regulatory change analysis, equivalence assessments, and policy submission drafting.

Source: European Commission, Targeted Consultation on the Review of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), 20 May 2026

Crypto Regulatory

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

MLR Registration and the FCA Cryptoasset Gateway to 25 October 2027

This matter concerns the transition of a United Kingdom cryptoasset business from FCA registration under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 to Part 4A permission under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. The question is whether MLR registration gives conversion, grandfathering, priority, or a right to continue after 25 October 2027, and what an affected firm should do before the gateway closes. This analysis assumes an existing UK-facing cryptoasset business, no relevant Part 4A permission, and an intention to continue after commencement.

Illia Prokopiev

ESMA's 2026 Custody Resilience CSA and the Rules That Actually Bind

ESMA’s 2026 Common Supervisory Action is a coordinated national review of digital operational resilience in crypto-asset custody. It will test whether selected crypto-asset service providers can demonstrate effective controls across six announced workstreams. The legal questions are which requirements are binding, how national competent authorities may assess control effectiveness, and what consequences may follow from a deficiency. This analysis assumes that the firm is permitted under MiCA Article 59 to provide custody and administration within Article 3(1)(17).

Illia Prokopiev

Stablecoin regulation in the US, Hong Kong and Singapore

Stablecoin and digital-token regulation now combines market-entry authorization with continuous financial-crime controls in daily operations. The question is whether the United States’ proposed payment-stablecoin customer identification program, Hong Kong’s narrow first licensing round, and Singapore’s digital payment token (DPT) directory support a bank-like compliance characterization. They do, with material limits. The more accurate proposition is that compliance is moving beyond approval into continuous financial-institution-grade operations.