From the journal

European Commission Publishes Draft AI Act Article 50 Transparency Guidelines, 8 May 2026

On 8 May 2026, the European Commission published draft Guidelines on transparency obligations under Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the AI Act) and opened a public consultation. The draft clarifies disclosure duties for chatbot operators, deepfake creators, emotion-recognition system deployers, and synthetic content producers. Comments close on 3 June 2026.

2 min read

The European Commission released its draft Guidelines on Article 50 of the AI Act on 8 May 2026. The text is non-binding. The Commission opened a public consultation alongside publication. The window closes on 3 June 2026. Article 50 transparency duties apply from 2 August 2026 under the AI Act's original calendar.

Article 50 imposes layered duties on providers and deployers. Providers of AI systems that interact directly with people must disclose the AI nature of the interaction. Providers of generative systems must mark synthetic content in machine-readable form. Deployers of deepfakes and AI-generated content on matters of public interest must disclose its origin. Deployers of emotion-recognition or biometric-categorisation systems must inform exposed persons. The draft Guidelines interpret each duty's scope.

Affected operators include consumer chatbot providers, generative image and video platforms, voice-cloning vendors, AI dubbing services, and enterprise deployers using emotion analytics in hiring or marketing. Public-interest deployers cover news organisations using AI to produce or edit content. The draft addresses interaction with the Code of Practice on marking AI-generated content.

The Guidelines do not bind. National authorities and the AI Office retain interpretive discretion. The Commission may revise the text after consultation. Article 50 enforcement begins on 2 August 2026 without dependency on the Guidelines' finalisation. The provisional Digital Omnibus deal of 7 May 2026 postpones only the Article 50(2) watermarking duty for providers, to 2 December 2026.

Licentium advises AI deployers and crypto and digital asset clients on transparency, content labelling, and end-user disclosures. Contact us before the 3 June 2026 consultation deadline if your operations rely on user-facing AI. Work we undertake includes consultation responses, Article 50 disclosure mapping, deepfake risk assessments, content watermarking design reviews, and chatbot UX compliance audits.

Source: European Commission, Draft Guidelines on the implementation of the transparency obligations for certain AI systems under Article 50 of the AI Act, 8 May 2026, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/draft-guidelines-implementation-transparency-obligations-certain-ai-systems-under-article-50-ai-act, confirmed 14 May 2026.

The information provided is not legal, tax, investment, or accounting advice and should not be used as such. It is for discussion purposes only. Seek guidance from your own legal counsel and advisors on any matters. The views presented are those of the author and not any other individual or organization. Some parts of the text may be automatically generated. The author of this material makes no guarantees or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information.

AI Regulatory

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

MLR Registration and the FCA Cryptoasset Gateway to 25 October 2027

This matter concerns the transition of a United Kingdom cryptoasset business from FCA registration under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 to Part 4A permission under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. The question is whether MLR registration gives conversion, grandfathering, priority, or a right to continue after 25 October 2027, and what an affected firm should do before the gateway closes. This analysis assumes an existing UK-facing cryptoasset business, no relevant Part 4A permission, and an intention to continue after commencement.

Illia Prokopiev

ESMA's 2026 Custody Resilience CSA and the Rules That Actually Bind

ESMA’s 2026 Common Supervisory Action is a coordinated national review of digital operational resilience in crypto-asset custody. It will test whether selected crypto-asset service providers can demonstrate effective controls across six announced workstreams. The legal questions are which requirements are binding, how national competent authorities may assess control effectiveness, and what consequences may follow from a deficiency. This analysis assumes that the firm is permitted under MiCA Article 59 to provide custody and administration within Article 3(1)(17).

Illia Prokopiev

Stablecoin regulation in the US, Hong Kong and Singapore

Stablecoin and digital-token regulation now combines market-entry authorization with continuous financial-crime controls in daily operations. The question is whether the United States’ proposed payment-stablecoin customer identification program, Hong Kong’s narrow first licensing round, and Singapore’s digital payment token (DPT) directory support a bank-like compliance characterization. They do, with material limits. The more accurate proposition is that compliance is moving beyond approval into continuous financial-institution-grade operations.