From the journal

European Commission Issues Draft Guidelines on High-Risk AI Classification Under Article 6

The European Commission published draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems under Article 6 of the EU AI Act, open for targeted consultation until June 23, 2026. The guidelines interpret the two-tier classification test and provide practical examples of systems that do and do not qualify as high-risk under Annex I and Annex III of the AI Act.

3 min read

The European Commission published draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems under Article 6 of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). The draft is open for targeted consultation until June 23, 2026. The guidelines aim to support uniform application of Article 6 across EU Member States by competent market surveillance authorities and by providers and deployers assessing whether their AI systems require full high-risk compliance.

Article 6 of the AI Act establishes a two-tier classification test. Under Article 6(1), an AI system is high-risk when it serves as a safety component of a product governed by EU harmonisation legislation listed in Annex I, and that product requires third-party conformity assessment. Under Article 6(2), an AI system is high-risk when it falls within a use-case category in Annex III, which covers biometric identification, critical infrastructure, education and vocational training, employment and worker management, access to essential private and public services, law enforcement, migration and border control, and administration of justice. Article 6(5) grants the Commission authority to issue guidelines including practical classification examples.

Providers of AI systems that may qualify as high-risk under the Annex III categories must register those systems in the EU AI database, conduct conformity assessments, establish quality management systems, and prepare technical documentation before placing systems on the EU market. Employers deploying AI in recruitment, promotion, or disciplinary decisions face classification exposure under Annex III category 4. Banks and insurance companies using AI for creditworthiness scoring or risk pricing face classification exposure under Annex III category 5. Providers can use the practical examples in the draft guidelines to assess their classification position ahead of finalisation.

The draft guidelines also clarify the scope of Article 6(3), which allows providers to demonstrate that a system falling within an Annex III category does not present a significant risk of harm despite its use-case classification, and therefore should not be treated as high-risk. The consultation accepts input from providers, deployers, market surveillance authorities, civil society, and academia until June 23, 2026. Final guidelines are expected before the Annex III compliance obligations fully apply.

Licentium advises AI system providers on Article 6 classification analysis and high-risk AI compliance under the EU AI Act, and may assist with Annex III use-case mapping and conformity assessment preparation. Please contact us to discuss your classification position. Work we undertake includes high-risk AI classification reviews, EU AI database registration support, technical documentation drafting, quality management system design, and conformity assessment coordination for EU market entrants.

Source: European Commission, Draft Commission Guidelines on the Classification of High-Risk AI Systems under Article 6 of the AI Act, consultation deadline 23 June 2026, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/draft-commission-guidelines-classification-high-risk-ai-systems

The information provided is not legal, tax, investment, or accounting advice and should not be used as such. It is for discussion purposes only. Seek guidance from your own legal counsel and advisors on any matters. The views presented are those of the author and not any other individual or organization. Some parts of the text may be automatically generated. The author of this material makes no guarantees or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information.

AI Regulatory

More from the journal

See all

EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Obligations Enter Force 2 August 2026, Commission Guidelines Adopted

Article 50 of the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) became applicable on 2 August 2026, imposing disclosure and content-marking duties on providers and deployers of AI-generated content, chatbots, emotion-recognition systems, and deepfake tools. The European Commission adopted implementing guidelines on 20 July 2026. Non-compliance can attract fines of up to EUR 15 million or 3% of worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher.

SEC Proposes Regulation Crypto Assets, First Bespoke Offering Regime, 18 August 2026

On 18 August 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed Regulation Crypto Assets, establishing the Commission's first dedicated offering regime for investment contracts involving crypto assets. The proposal creates two registration exemptions under the Securities Act of 1933: a startup exemption capped at $5 million over four years and a fundraising exemption permitting up to $75 million per 12-month period. The public comment period runs 60 days from Federal Register publication.

PEB for UCC Confirms Article 8 Permits Tokenized Securities Transfers Without Statutory Amendment

The Permanent Editorial Board for the Uniform Commercial Code has issued a report concluding that existing Article 8 of the UCC permits issuers to use digital tokens as the mechanism for transferring uncertificated securities and for establishing control over such securities. The report resolves a central legal uncertainty for US digital asset and securities markets without requiring statutory amendment.