From the journal

Colorado Governor Signs SB 26-189, Replacing 2024 AI Act Effective 1 January 2027

Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed Senate Bill 26-189 on 14 May 2026, repealing and replacing the 2024 Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence Act. The revised law narrows its predecessor's scope, replacing duties of care and risk management obligations with pre-use notice, post-adverse-outcome disclosure, and consumer rights tied to covered automated decision-making technology. The law takes effect 1 January 2027.

2 min read

Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed Senate Bill 26-189 on 14 May 2026, repealing and replacing Senate Bill 24-205, the 2024 Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence Act. SB 26-189 is formally titled the Automated Decision-Making Technology Act and takes effect 1 January 2027.

SB 26-189 defines "automated decision-making technology" as any computational system that processes personal data to generate output used to make, guide, or assist a decision, including predictions, recommendations, classifications, rankings, and scores. The prior law's duty of care, risk management program, and impact assessment requirements are repealed. In their place, SB 26-189 imposes three obligations on deployers: a pre-use notice to consumers before covered automated decision-making technology is applied in a consequential decision; a post-adverse-outcome notice delivered within 30 days where the technology materially influences a decision that adversely affects the consumer; and consumer rights to access and correct personal data and to request meaningful human review of the system's output.

The law applies to private entities deploying covered technology in consequential decisions affecting Colorado residents. "Consumer" is defined to include Colorado-resident employees and job applicants, bringing workforce decisions within scope and filling a gap left by the Colorado Privacy Act, which largely excludes employment data from its consumer-rights provisions. Developers placing automated decision-making systems on the Colorado market and deployers integrating them into hiring, lending, housing, education, and healthcare processes must assess whether their products meet the "covered" threshold and update notice and disclosure procedures before the January 2027 effective date.

The Colorado Attorney General has stated that enforcement will be deferred until rulemaking concludes, providing additional lead time for compliance. The precise scope of "consequential decision" and the threshold for "material influence" remain open questions pending final rules. Entities should monitor the AG's rulemaking docket at coag.gov for publication of proposed rules.

Licentium advises on AI governance, technology regulation, and compliance program design across North American and European jurisdictions. We may advise on this matter or assist through our partner network. Work we undertake includes AI Act classification analysis, automated decision-making policy drafting, employer AI-use impact assessments, and regulatory response strategy for clients deploying automated systems in consequential decisions.

Source: Colorado General Assembly, SB 26-189 Automated Decision-Making Technology, signed 14 May 2026

AI Regulatory

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

Foreign Ownership of a Delaware or Wyoming Entity: Federal Tax Classification, Information Reporting, Withholding, and State Duties

A non-U.S. person may own a Delaware or Wyoming LLC or a Delaware corporation, yet formation alone does not settle the federal tax result, the reporting burden, confidentiality, or the right to work in the country. This part takes the U.S. entity as chosen and examines classification, Form 5472 reporting, source and effectively connected income, partner and shareholder withholding, tax residence and immigration, duties beyond the formation state, real property and estate exposure, and treaty and home-country dependencies.

Illia Prokopiev

Structuring Cross-Border Digital-Asset Ventures (Part 2)

A cross-border digital-asset group must allocate protocol stewardship, token issuance, customer-facing regulated services, pooled investment, treasury, and founder functions before it selects any jurisdiction. The question presented is where each of those functions can lawfully sit across sixteen jurisdictions and the European Union and EEA overlay, as of 27 August 2026.

Illia Prokopiev

Function-First Entity Design for Cross-Border Digital-Asset Ventures

Cross-border digital-asset ventures often separate several legal roles. Those roles include the venture issuer, operating company, customer-facing licensee, token issuer, pooled vehicle, treasury body, and protocol administrator. The Question Presented is which roles eight jurisdictions can support as of 27 August 2026.