From the journal

Malaysia National AI Office Opens Consultation on Proposed AI Governance Bill, 10 July 2026

On 10 July 2026, Malaysia's National Artificial Intelligence Office (NAIO) published a Public Consultation Paper on the proposed AI Governance Bill. The Bill would establish Malaysia's first statutory AI framework, adopting a risk-based model and covering the full AI lifecycle from design through retirement. It includes specific provisions on deepfakes, AI-generated copyright, and data sovereignty.

3 min read

Malaysia's National Artificial Intelligence Office (NAIO) released a Public Consultation Paper on 10 July 2026, seeking input on the proposed structure of a dedicated AI Governance Bill. The Bill, when enacted, will constitute Malaysia's first statutory framework specifically governing artificial intelligence systems across all economic sectors. The NAIO has stated the Bill is expected to be presented to Parliament before end-2026, following Cabinet presentation as the next procedural step.

The Consultation Paper proposes a risk-based classification model in which AI systems are assigned to risk tiers with proportionate obligations at each tier. High-risk AI applications would require mandatory AI impact assessments before deployment, incident reporting within defined timelines, and ongoing compliance with baseline operational safety standards. All AI systems regardless of risk tier would be subject to minimum ethical and safety principles. Three specific statutory provisions are proposed: deepfake offence provisions addressing AI-generated synthetic media used to cause harm; copyright attribution rules for AI-generated content and liability for AI training data use; and data sovereignty requirements restricting cross-border transfer of AI training datasets containing personal data of Malaysian persons.

The Bill, in the form proposed, will affect technology companies developing AI products for the Malaysian market, financial institutions and licensed payment service providers using AI in credit decisions and fraud detection, healthcare operators deploying AI diagnostics or triage tools, and digital platform operators running AI recommendation or content moderation systems. Foreign operators delivering AI-enabled services to Malaysian users without local establishment may fall within scope where the AI system's outputs are directed at Malaysian persons, following the extraterritorial approach in the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 and the EU AI Act.

The Consultation Paper is a pre-legislative document and the final Bill may differ materially. The NAIO has not published a deadline for consultation responses. Open questions include the precise definition of high-risk AI applications in the Malaysian context, which sector regulators will enforce the obligations in their respective domains, the treatment of open-source AI models and small-scale operators, and whether the deepfake offence provisions will require specific intent or apply on a strict liability basis.

Licentium monitors APAC AI regulatory developments and advises multinational operators entering or operating in Southeast Asian markets. We assist with AI governance bill consultation submissions, AI governance programme design calibrated to APAC requirements, and comparative analysis against the EU AI Act and other binding frameworks. Work we undertake includes APAC AI regulatory monitoring, AI Governance Bill consultation response, market-entry compliance review, and AI risk classification mapping.

Source: Malaysia National Artificial Intelligence Office (NAIO), AI Governance Consultation Paper, 10 July 2026

AI Regulatory

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

Foreign Ownership of a Delaware or Wyoming Entity: Federal Tax Classification, Information Reporting, Withholding, and State Duties

A non-U.S. person may own a Delaware or Wyoming LLC or a Delaware corporation, yet formation alone does not settle the federal tax result, the reporting burden, confidentiality, or the right to work in the country. This part takes the U.S. entity as chosen and examines classification, Form 5472 reporting, source and effectively connected income, partner and shareholder withholding, tax residence and immigration, duties beyond the formation state, real property and estate exposure, and treaty and home-country dependencies.

Illia Prokopiev

Structuring Cross-Border Digital-Asset Ventures (Part 2)

A cross-border digital-asset group must allocate protocol stewardship, token issuance, customer-facing regulated services, pooled investment, treasury, and founder functions before it selects any jurisdiction. The question presented is where each of those functions can lawfully sit across sixteen jurisdictions and the European Union and EEA overlay, as of 27 August 2026.

Illia Prokopiev

Function-First Entity Design for Cross-Border Digital-Asset Ventures

Cross-border digital-asset ventures often separate several legal roles. Those roles include the venture issuer, operating company, customer-facing licensee, token issuer, pooled vehicle, treasury body, and protocol administrator. The Question Presented is which roles eight jurisdictions can support as of 27 August 2026.