From the journal

Vietnam Politburo Issues Conclusion 51-KL/TW on IP and AI Governance, June 2026

On 17 June 2026, the Politburo of the Communist Party of Vietnam issued Conclusion No. 51-KL/TW, directing that intellectual property be treated as a strategic national asset and mandating legal reforms to address AI-generated content, software piracy, and technology licensing. The Conclusion signals forthcoming amendments to Vietnam's IP Law and stronger inter-agency enforcement against IP infringement.

2 min read

The Politburo of the Communist Party of Vietnam issued Conclusion No. 51-KL/TW on 17 June 2026, on promoting intellectual property work to serve socio-economic development. The Conclusion operates as a binding policy directive to government ministries, state agencies, and the Communist Party's subordinate bodies. It directs the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Ministry of Culture, and law enforcement agencies to reform IP legislation and strengthen enforcement, with explicit attention to intellectual property issues arising from artificial intelligence.

The Conclusion mandates that Vietnam treat intellectual property as a distinct economic asset capable of collateralisation and investment attraction. It directs the Ministry of Science and Technology to accelerate amendments to the Intellectual Property Law 2022 to clarify ownership and authorship of AI-generated works, and to establish legal instruments enabling businesses to use IP as capital for investment. The Conclusion also calls for the creation of specialised IP adjudication bodies and orders stricter criminal enforcement against software piracy, academic plagiarism, and infringement of patents and industrial designs.

Technology companies, AI developers, software vendors, and content businesses operating in or supplying content into Vietnam must review their IP portfolios against tightening enforcement. Foreign companies licensing technology or software into Vietnam face heightened scrutiny of their licensing structures and anti-piracy provisions. AI developers producing content for Vietnamese users face regulatory uncertainty over the legal status of AI-generated outputs under Vietnamese copyright law, pending the IP Law amendments the Conclusion directs.

The Conclusion is a party directive, not enacted legislation, and creates political instruction rather than directly enforceable legal rights or obligations. The specific legislative amendments it mandates require action by the National Assembly or the government through decrees. No enacted timeline for IP Law amendments or specialised IP courts has been publicly confirmed. Vietnam already operates an AI risk classification regime under Decree No. 142/2026/ND-CP, effective 1 May 2026, to which AI developers active in Vietnam are already subject.

Licentium advises technology and creative industry clients on IP strategy and AI regulatory compliance in Vietnam and other Southeast Asian and EU markets. Contact us to discuss your exposure. Work we undertake includes Vietnam IP portfolio structuring and risk assessment, AI-generated content ownership advice, technology licensing agreement review under Vietnamese IP law, AI Act compliance for businesses active across ASEAN and the EU, and cross-border enforcement strategy.

Source: Voice of Vietnam, Politburo places intellectual property at heart of national development strategy, 17 June 2026

AI Regulatory

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

Foreign Ownership of a Delaware or Wyoming Entity: Federal Tax Classification, Information Reporting, Withholding, and State Duties

A non-U.S. person may own a Delaware or Wyoming LLC or a Delaware corporation, yet formation alone does not settle the federal tax result, the reporting burden, confidentiality, or the right to work in the country. This part takes the U.S. entity as chosen and examines classification, Form 5472 reporting, source and effectively connected income, partner and shareholder withholding, tax residence and immigration, duties beyond the formation state, real property and estate exposure, and treaty and home-country dependencies.

Illia Prokopiev

Structuring Cross-Border Digital-Asset Ventures (Part 2)

A cross-border digital-asset group must allocate protocol stewardship, token issuance, customer-facing regulated services, pooled investment, treasury, and founder functions before it selects any jurisdiction. The question presented is where each of those functions can lawfully sit across sixteen jurisdictions and the European Union and EEA overlay, as of 27 August 2026.

Illia Prokopiev

Function-First Entity Design for Cross-Border Digital-Asset Ventures

Cross-border digital-asset ventures often separate several legal roles. Those roles include the venture issuer, operating company, customer-facing licensee, token issuer, pooled vehicle, treasury body, and protocol administrator. The Question Presented is which roles eight jurisdictions can support as of 27 August 2026.