From the journal

UK Crime and Policing Act 2026 Criminalises Unsafe AI Chatbot Supply, United Kingdom, April 2026

The UK Crime and Policing Act 2026 received Royal Assent on 29 April 2026. Section 255 creates three criminal offences for AI chatbot suppliers: deploying a chatbot that produces illegal content, failing to conduct an adequate risk assessment, and failing to mitigate identified risks of harm. Convictions on indictment carry a maximum sentence of five years' imprisonment. The Act brings AI chatbot providers within scope of the Online Safety Act 2023 illegal content obligations.

2 min read

The UK Crime and Policing Act 2026 received Royal Assent on 29 April 2026. Section 255 of the Act creates criminal offences for suppliers of AI chatbots that produce illegal or harmful content. The provisions are enacted law in force from the date of Royal Assent. AI chatbot providers are now within scope of the illegal content rules in the Online Safety Act 2023.

Section 255 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 defines three distinct offences. The first is supplying an AI chatbot that produces content specified in subsection (4). The second is failing to carry out a suitable and sufficient risk assessment before supplying such a chatbot. The third is failing to mitigate or manage risks of identified harm. Specified content means content that is illegal for any user under section 59 of the Online Safety Act 2023. For users under 18, the category extends to content where an AI falsely presents itself as human. Penalties reach five years' imprisonment on conviction on indictment.

AI chatbot developers, API providers, and platform operators deploying conversational AI to UK users must assess whether their systems can generate content caught by the specified content definition in section 255(4). Operators serving users under 18 face broader obligations: their systems must not produce content designed to mislead children into believing they interact with a human. Third-party AI model customers are classified as suppliers under section 255 and bear direct liability rather than downstream platform liability. Providers must document their risk assessments to demonstrate compliance in any enforcement proceeding.

Section 255 does not include a statutory safe harbour for suppliers who conduct risk assessments that prove insufficient after the fact. Ofcom guidance on what constitutes a suitable and sufficient risk assessment for AI chatbots under the combined Crime and Policing Act and Online Safety Act regime is pending. The boundary between platform liability for user-generated content under the Online Safety Act and direct supply liability under section 255 has not yet been addressed by regulators.

Licentium advises technology companies and AI product developers on UK regulatory obligations. If your AI chatbot products serve UK users, we can assist with compliance analysis and risk assessment documentation. Work we undertake includes Online Safety Act compliance, AI product risk assessments, criminal liability analysis for technology products, and regulatory engagement strategy.

Source: Crime and Policing Act 2026, s 255 (UK c.20), Royal Assent 29 April 2026

AI Regulatory

More from the journal

See all

EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency: 2026 Implementation and Compliance Guide

Article 50 of the EU AI Act assigns disclosure duties to providers and deployers of certain AI systems. The question is which duties apply on August 2, 2026, what the official guidance and Code add, and what remains unsettled. This analysis assumes nonpersonal use with an EU territorial connection. It excludes exclusively military, defence, or national-security uses. It assumes no authorized law-enforcement exception. It states the law as of July 31, 2026.

Illia Prokopiev

Dubai VASP Licensing: Fresh Authorizations Signal Continued Regulatory Momentum

Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority records permissions for specified virtual-asset activities in Dubai outside the Dubai International Financial Centre. The question is whether “Dubai VASP licensing continues to show fresh authorization activity” is supported as at 31 July 2026, and what those records legally permit. This analysis treats VARA’s English register and entity pages as the current factual record. It distinguishes active full licences from non-operational in-principle approvals.

Illia Prokopiev

UK Crypto Authorisation: From Future Watching to Application Preparation

The United Kingdom has made legislation and principal FCA rules for a new authorisation regime covering specified cryptoasset activities. The question is whether firms should now prioritise application work, given the published dates and FCA pre-application warning. This analysis tests that proposition as at 31 July 2026. It assumes no firm-specific facts and addresses commercial cryptoasset services provided in or to the United Kingdom.