From the journal

UK Bar Standards Board publishes guidance on barrister use of AI, 18 May 2026

On 18 May 2026, the Bar Standards Board published Guidance on the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Other Technologies. The guidance applies existing BSB Handbook duties to AI use by barristers in England and Wales. It warns against free generative AI tools whose terms allow provider retention of input data, and clarifies when disclosure of AI use is required to clients, courts and the regulator.

3 min read

The Bar Standards Board published Guidance on the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Other Technologies on 18 May 2026. The document is final regulator guidance. It is not a consultation. It does not change the BSB Handbook. It explains how existing Core Duties and Conduct Rules apply when a barrister uses AI or other emerging technology.

The guidance pins AI use to Core Duties in Part 2 of the BSB Handbook. Core Duty 5 covers public trust in the profession. Core Duty 6 covers client confidentiality. Core Duty 7 covers competent work and service. The guidance cross refers to the Ayinde v London Borough of Haringey judgment on fabricated case citations. It restates the existing duty not to mislead the court.

The direct addressees are practising barristers in England and Wales, including those in BSB entities. Chambers must assess AI tool terms before use. Free generative AI providers typically claim rights to input data, store prompts indefinitely and use them to train models. The BSB treats those terms as incompatible with confidentiality duties. Barristers must verify AI output. They must evaluate risk before adopting a tool and keep a baseline of AI literacy.

Barristers are not required to disclose AI use in every case. Disclosure is required where AI materially affects the nature or scope of the service. Barristers must respond honestly to questions from a court or the BSB about AI use. The guidance does not create new reporting obligations. It does not displace the Bar Council's separate generative AI guidance.

We may advise on AI governance for legal practices. We can call on a partner network of solicitors and barristers where local regulatory input is required. Contact us to scope a piece of work. Work we undertake includes AI policy drafting, vendor terms review, confidentiality assessments, staff training programmes and incident response procedures aligned with regulator guidance.

Source: Bar Standards Board, Guidance on the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Other Technologies, 18 May 2026, https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/resources/new-guidance-supports-barristers-to-safely-adopt-artificial-intelligence-and-emerging-technologies.html

The information provided is not legal, tax, investment, or accounting advice and should not be used as such. It is for discussion purposes only. Seek guidance from your own legal counsel and advisors on any matters. The views presented are those of the author and not any other individual or organization. Some parts of the text may be automatically generated. The author of this material makes no guarantees or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information.

AI Regulatory

More from the journal

See all

Colorado Enacts SB 26-189 Replacing Prior AI Consumer Rules with Automated Decision-Making Technology Obligations, 2026

Colorado SB 26-189, the Automated Decision-Making Technology Act, repeals and replaces the consumer AI protections in SB 24-205, establishing new obligations for developers and deployers of covered automated decision-making technology in consequential decisions. Developer obligations take effect 1 January 2027. Violations constitute deceptive trade practices under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, enforceable by the Attorney General.

UK Designates 18 Cryptocurrency Exchanges Under Russia Sanctions Regulations, 26 May 2026

On 26 May 2026, the UK designated 18 cryptocurrency exchanges under The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, including Huobi Global S.A., operator of HTX, and three Georgian Russia-focused exchanges. OFSI confirmed HTX is subject to UK financial sanctions by reason of Huobi's ownership. The action marks the first time the UK has directly sanctioned cryptocurrency exchanges in connection with Russian sanctions evasion.

European Commission Opens Consultation on Draft Guidelines for High-Risk AI System Classification Under Article 6, June 2026

The European Commission has published draft guidelines clarifying when an AI system qualifies as high-risk under Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). A targeted consultation is open until 23 June 2026. The guidelines are not legally binding but reflect the Commission's interpretation and will guide market surveillance authorities and AI providers in applying the high-risk classification rules.

Ready to launch without the regulatory guesswork?

Book a 30-minute consultation. We'll map your AI or licensing path and tell you exactly what's required, in plain language.