From the journal

Supreme Court of Victoria issues AI Practice Note SC Gen 25, 14 May 2026

On 14 May 2026, the Supreme Court of Victoria issued Practice Note SC Gen 25 on the use of artificial intelligence by court users, replacing the May 2024 Guidelines for Litigants. The Practice Note requires meaningful human verification of AI output, identification of AI-generated portions of court documents and special caution with affidavits and witness statements.

3 min read

On 14 May 2026, the Supreme Court of Victoria issued Practice Note SC Gen 25 on the use of artificial intelligence by court users. The Practice Note commenced on the same date. It replaces the May 2024 Guidelines for Litigants on the responsible use of artificial intelligence in litigation. The Court issued separate Judicial Guidelines covering use of AI by judicial officers.

Practice Note SC Gen 25 is issued by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Victoria. It applies to all court users in all jurisdictions of the Court. It follows the Victorian Law Reform Commission review of AI in litigation. It updates the Court's earlier position on generative AI tools and sits alongside the new Judicial Guidelines.

The direct addressees are practitioners, litigants in person, expert witnesses and any party that files material with the Court. Content produced using AI must be verified with meaningful human control. Court users are responsible for ensuring AI output is current, complete, accurate and applicable to the jurisdiction. Court users must be able to identify the specific portions of court documents produced using AI and explain how the output was verified.

Particular caution applies to affidavits, witness statements and other documents that form evidence. Those documents must be sworn, affirmed or finalised in a form that reflects the person's own knowledge and words. The Practice Note does not ban use of AI tools. It does not require disclosure in every case. It does require the user to account for AI use on request from the Court.

We may advise on AI governance for litigation teams operating in Australian courts. We can call on a partner network of Australian counsel where on-the-ground filings are required. Contact us to scope a piece of work. Work we undertake includes AI use policies, verification procedures, evidence preparation protocols, expert witness templates and training aligned with court expectations.

Source: Supreme Court of Victoria, Practice Note SC Gen 25 - The Use of Artificial Intelligence by Court Users, 14 May 2026, https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/areas/legal-resources/practice-notes/sc-gen-25-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-by-court-users

The information provided is not legal, tax, investment, or accounting advice and should not be used as such. It is for discussion purposes only. Seek guidance from your own legal counsel and advisors on any matters. The views presented are those of the author and not any other individual or organization. Some parts of the text may be automatically generated. The author of this material makes no guarantees or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information.

AI Regulatory

More from the journal

See all

Colorado Enacts SB 26-189 Replacing Prior AI Consumer Rules with Automated Decision-Making Technology Obligations, 2026

Colorado SB 26-189, the Automated Decision-Making Technology Act, repeals and replaces the consumer AI protections in SB 24-205, establishing new obligations for developers and deployers of covered automated decision-making technology in consequential decisions. Developer obligations take effect 1 January 2027. Violations constitute deceptive trade practices under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, enforceable by the Attorney General.

UK Designates 18 Cryptocurrency Exchanges Under Russia Sanctions Regulations, 26 May 2026

On 26 May 2026, the UK designated 18 cryptocurrency exchanges under The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, including Huobi Global S.A., operator of HTX, and three Georgian Russia-focused exchanges. OFSI confirmed HTX is subject to UK financial sanctions by reason of Huobi's ownership. The action marks the first time the UK has directly sanctioned cryptocurrency exchanges in connection with Russian sanctions evasion.

European Commission Opens Consultation on Draft Guidelines for High-Risk AI System Classification Under Article 6, June 2026

The European Commission has published draft guidelines clarifying when an AI system qualifies as high-risk under Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). A targeted consultation is open until 23 June 2026. The guidelines are not legally binding but reflect the Commission's interpretation and will guide market surveillance authorities and AI providers in applying the high-risk classification rules.

Ready to launch without the regulatory guesswork?

Book a 30-minute consultation. We'll map your AI or licensing path and tell you exactly what's required, in plain language.