From the journal

South Africa's prediction markets sit in a regulatory grey zone

An ENS analysis maps how prediction market contracts in South Africa cut across crypto regulation, exchange control and the law of derivatives, exposing a gap that regulators have yet to close.

2 min read

A new analysis by ENS sets out a problem that regulators across emerging markets are starting to face. Prediction markets, where users buy contracts that pay out based on the outcome of an event, do not fit cleanly inside South Africa's existing legal categories.

The starting point: crypto as a financial product

In 2022, the Financial Sector Conduct Authority declared crypto assets to be financial products under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act. That move brought intermediation services for crypto into the conduct of business framework. It did not address what happens when a token is also a contract on a future event.

Three regimes pull on the same product

ENS argues that prediction markets sit at the intersection of three legal regimes. The first is the crypto regulatory framework. The second is the exchange control regime, which still covers cross border flows of value. The third is the law of derivatives, including the OTC derivative provider regime under the Financial Markets Act.

The analytical difficulty is that prediction market contracts can look like several things at once. They can look like tokens, since they sit on a public chain. They can look like wagers, since the payout depends on a binary event. And they can look like derivatives, since the holder takes a position on a future state of the world.

The supervisor depends on the characterisation

Each characterisation pulls in a different supervisor and a different rulebook. A pure crypto reading puts intermediaries inside the FSCA conduct perimeter. A derivatives reading brings the platform inside the OTC derivative provider regime. A gambling reading activates provincial gambling boards rather than financial regulators.

Practical takeaway for platforms

For platforms targeting South African users, the practical consequence is that there is no single licence that clearly covers a prediction market business. Operators should obtain legal opinions on each leg of the contract. They should monitor FSCA conduct standards. They should engage early with the South African Reserve Bank where cross border flows are involved. Legislative clarification is likely to follow market activity rather than precede it.

Prediction MarketsSouth AfricaFSCA

More from the journal

See all

Bank of England Publishes Draft Rules for Systemic Stablecoin Issuers

The Bank of England published a policy statement and draft Code of Practice setting out the regulatory regime for systemic stablecoin issuers in the UK in June 2026. The draft rules introduce a GBP 40 billion temporary issuance guardrail per stablecoin, permit issuers to hold up to 70% of reserves in short-term UK government debt, and require the balance in central bank deposits. The consultation closes 22 September 2026; the Bank intends to finalise the Code of Practice by end of 2026.

Connecticut Enacts AI Responsibility and Transparency Act, Effective October 2026

On 2 June 2026, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed Senate Bill 5 into law as Public Act 26-15, the Connecticut Artificial Intelligence Responsibility and Transparency Act. The law creates disclosure obligations for employers using automated employment decision tools, governance requirements for frontier AI developers, product standards for AI companion systems, and safety obligations for online platforms serving minors. Most provisions take effect 1 October 2026; the Attorney General holds exclusive enforcement authority.

EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Obligations Apply from 2 August 2026

Four categories of transparency obligations under Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 become binding on AI system providers and deployers across the EU on 2 August 2026. The European Commission published a final Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content on 10 June 2026 as a voluntary compliance tool, alongside draft guidelines issued on 8 May 2026 that remain under finalisation. AI systems placed on the EU market before the August deadline have until 2 December 2026 to comply with the machine-readable marking obligation in Article 50(2).