From the journal

South Africa's prediction markets sit in a regulatory grey zone

An ENS analysis maps how prediction market contracts in South Africa cut across crypto regulation, exchange control and the law of derivatives, exposing a gap that regulators have yet to close.

2 min read

A new analysis by ENS sets out a problem that regulators across emerging markets are starting to face. Prediction markets, where users buy contracts that pay out based on the outcome of an event, do not fit cleanly inside South Africa's existing legal categories.

The starting point: crypto as a financial product

In 2022, the Financial Sector Conduct Authority declared crypto assets to be financial products under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act. That move brought intermediation services for crypto into the conduct of business framework. It did not address what happens when a token is also a contract on a future event.

Three regimes pull on the same product

ENS argues that prediction markets sit at the intersection of three legal regimes. The first is the crypto regulatory framework. The second is the exchange control regime, which still covers cross border flows of value. The third is the law of derivatives, including the OTC derivative provider regime under the Financial Markets Act.

The analytical difficulty is that prediction market contracts can look like several things at once. They can look like tokens, since they sit on a public chain. They can look like wagers, since the payout depends on a binary event. And they can look like derivatives, since the holder takes a position on a future state of the world.

The supervisor depends on the characterisation

Each characterisation pulls in a different supervisor and a different rulebook. A pure crypto reading puts intermediaries inside the FSCA conduct perimeter. A derivatives reading brings the platform inside the OTC derivative provider regime. A gambling reading activates provincial gambling boards rather than financial regulators.

Practical takeaway for platforms

For platforms targeting South African users, the practical consequence is that there is no single licence that clearly covers a prediction market business. Operators should obtain legal opinions on each leg of the contract. They should monitor FSCA conduct standards. They should engage early with the South African Reserve Bank where cross border flows are involved. Legislative clarification is likely to follow market activity rather than precede it.

Prediction MarketsSouth AfricaFSCA

More from the journal

See all

European Commission Publishes Draft Guidelines Classifying High-Risk AI Systems Under Article 6, May 2026

On May 19, 2026, the European Commission published draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems under Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (EU AI Act), open for consultation until June 23, 2026. The guidelines interpret key classification concepts and provide worked examples across eight Annex III sectors. The Commission has also postponed Article 6(2) compliance from August 2026 to December 2027 and Article 6(1) from August 2027 to August 2028.

Connecticut Enacts Sweeping AI Law Covering Employment, Healthcare, and Online Safety in June 2026

Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed Senate Bill 5 on June 2, 2026, enacting the Connecticut Artificial Intelligence Responsibility and Transparency Act (CART Act, Public Act 26-15). The law creates disclosure obligations for employers using AI in hiring and layoff decisions, safety protocols for chatbot operators, and content-provenance requirements for large-scale generative AI systems. Compliance deadlines run from October 2026 through January 2028.

New Zealand Online Casino Gambling Regulations 2026 Released, Effective July 2026

New Zealand released the Online Casino Gambling Regulations 2026 in June 2026, made under the Online Casino Gambling Act 2026 (Public Act 2026 No 14). The prohibition on unlicensed online casino gambling applies from 1 July 2026. The Act establishes a three-stage licensing regime for up to 15 operators, administered by the Secretary for Internal Affairs, with age-verification, harm-minimisation, and problem-gambler exclusion obligations.

Ready to launch without the regulatory guesswork?

Book a 30-minute consultation. We'll map your AI or licensing path and tell you exactly what's required, in plain language.