From the journal

SEC Proposes Token Taxonomy Clarifying Federal Securities Laws for Crypto Assets, March 2026

In March 2026, the SEC proposed an interpretive release (Release No. 33-11412, File No. S7-2026-09) establishing a token taxonomy and clarifying the application of federal securities laws to crypto assets. The taxonomy designates digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, and qualifying payment stablecoins as generally outside the securities perimeter. Only tokenised traditional securities remain subject to registration and disclosure requirements.

3 min read

In March 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed an interpretive release (Release No. 33-11412, File No. S7-2026-09) clarifying when crypto assets are subject to the federal securities laws. The release is at proposed-rule stage. The SEC described it as resolving more than a decade of uncertainty about the application of the Howey investment contract test to digital assets. A comment period followed publication; comment letters were received through April 2026.

Release 33-11412 establishes five token categories. Four are generally not securities: digital commodities (tokens necessary to use or participate in a crypto system, deriving value from that system's programmatic operation and market supply and demand); digital collectibles (tokens representing artwork, music, videos, trading cards, in-game items, or internet-native cultural references); digital tools (tokens performing a practical function including membership, ticketing, or credentialing within a crypto system); and payment stablecoins (tokens designed to maintain a stable value relative to a reference asset and used for payment or settlement, subject to the GENIUS Act). Only digital securities, meaning tokenised traditional securities, remain subject to full federal securities registration and disclosure obligations.

Crypto exchanges listing tokens outside the digital securities category would not need to register as national securities exchanges or broker-dealers under the federal securities laws for those tokens. Token issuers would not file registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for digital commodity, digital collectible, or digital tool offerings. The SEC stated it will use rulemaking, interpretive, and exemptive authority to set standards for market participants going forward, rather than relying on enforcement actions.

The proposed release addresses airdrops, protocol mining, protocol staking, and wrapping of non-security crypto assets, indicating these transactions do not create investment contracts under federal securities laws. The taxonomy remains at proposed stage and final definitions may differ from the proposal. The interaction between SEC jurisdiction over digital securities and CFTC jurisdiction over digital commodities as commodity contracts under the Commodity Exchange Act is not resolved in this release and requires further interagency coordination.

Licentium advises on US crypto asset regulatory analysis and has a partner network for entities operating under SEC and CFTC jurisdiction. Work we undertake includes token classification analysis under the Howey test and the proposed SEC taxonomy, securities registration exemption assessments, exchange and broker-dealer registration analysis, and digital asset compliance reviews for issuers and trading platforms.

Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Release No. 33-11412, Application of the Federal Securities Laws to Certain Types of Crypto Assets (File No. S7-2026-09), March 2026

Crypto Regulatory

More from the journal

See all

European Commission Publishes Draft Guidelines Classifying High-Risk AI Systems Under Article 6, May 2026

On May 19, 2026, the European Commission published draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems under Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (EU AI Act), open for consultation until June 23, 2026. The guidelines interpret key classification concepts and provide worked examples across eight Annex III sectors. The Commission has also postponed Article 6(2) compliance from August 2026 to December 2027 and Article 6(1) from August 2027 to August 2028.

Connecticut Enacts Sweeping AI Law Covering Employment, Healthcare, and Online Safety in June 2026

Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed Senate Bill 5 on June 2, 2026, enacting the Connecticut Artificial Intelligence Responsibility and Transparency Act (CART Act, Public Act 26-15). The law creates disclosure obligations for employers using AI in hiring and layoff decisions, safety protocols for chatbot operators, and content-provenance requirements for large-scale generative AI systems. Compliance deadlines run from October 2026 through January 2028.

New Zealand Online Casino Gambling Regulations 2026 Released, Effective July 2026

New Zealand released the Online Casino Gambling Regulations 2026 in June 2026, made under the Online Casino Gambling Act 2026 (Public Act 2026 No 14). The prohibition on unlicensed online casino gambling applies from 1 July 2026. The Act establishes a three-stage licensing regime for up to 15 operators, administered by the Secretary for Internal Affairs, with age-verification, harm-minimisation, and problem-gambler exclusion obligations.

Ready to launch without the regulatory guesswork?

Book a 30-minute consultation. We'll map your AI or licensing path and tell you exactly what's required, in plain language.