From the journal

SEC Proposes Token Taxonomy Clarifying Federal Securities Laws for Crypto Assets, March 2026

In March 2026, the SEC proposed an interpretive release (Release No. 33-11412, File No. S7-2026-09) establishing a token taxonomy and clarifying the application of federal securities laws to crypto assets. The taxonomy designates digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, and qualifying payment stablecoins as generally outside the securities perimeter. Only tokenised traditional securities remain subject to registration and disclosure requirements.

3 min read

In March 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed an interpretive release (Release No. 33-11412, File No. S7-2026-09) clarifying when crypto assets are subject to the federal securities laws. The release is at proposed-rule stage. The SEC described it as resolving more than a decade of uncertainty about the application of the Howey investment contract test to digital assets. A comment period followed publication; comment letters were received through April 2026.

Release 33-11412 establishes five token categories. Four are generally not securities: digital commodities (tokens necessary to use or participate in a crypto system, deriving value from that system's programmatic operation and market supply and demand); digital collectibles (tokens representing artwork, music, videos, trading cards, in-game items, or internet-native cultural references); digital tools (tokens performing a practical function including membership, ticketing, or credentialing within a crypto system); and payment stablecoins (tokens designed to maintain a stable value relative to a reference asset and used for payment or settlement, subject to the GENIUS Act). Only digital securities, meaning tokenised traditional securities, remain subject to full federal securities registration and disclosure obligations.

Crypto exchanges listing tokens outside the digital securities category would not need to register as national securities exchanges or broker-dealers under the federal securities laws for those tokens. Token issuers would not file registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for digital commodity, digital collectible, or digital tool offerings. The SEC stated it will use rulemaking, interpretive, and exemptive authority to set standards for market participants going forward, rather than relying on enforcement actions.

The proposed release addresses airdrops, protocol mining, protocol staking, and wrapping of non-security crypto assets, indicating these transactions do not create investment contracts under federal securities laws. The taxonomy remains at proposed stage and final definitions may differ from the proposal. The interaction between SEC jurisdiction over digital securities and CFTC jurisdiction over digital commodities as commodity contracts under the Commodity Exchange Act is not resolved in this release and requires further interagency coordination.

Licentium advises on US crypto asset regulatory analysis and has a partner network for entities operating under SEC and CFTC jurisdiction. Work we undertake includes token classification analysis under the Howey test and the proposed SEC taxonomy, securities registration exemption assessments, exchange and broker-dealer registration analysis, and digital asset compliance reviews for issuers and trading platforms.

Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Release No. 33-11412, Application of the Federal Securities Laws to Certain Types of Crypto Assets (File No. S7-2026-09), March 2026

Crypto Regulatory

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

Crypto Vaults and Lending Strategies Under U.S. Federal Securities Law

Commissioner Hester M. Peirce’s July 22, 2026 statement does not establish binding law, but it identifies the principal federal securities-law questions raised by crypto vaults and onchain lending strategies. This analysis examines when vault interests, lending claims, receipt tokens, and related service-provider activities may trigger the Securities Act, Exchange Act, Investment Company Act, and Investment Advisers Act.

MiCAR Transitional Regime for CASPs Expires Across the EU, July 2026

On 1 July 2026, the MiCAR transitional period under Article 143(3) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 expired across the EU. Former virtual asset service providers operating under national registrations must now hold a MiCAR crypto-asset service provider authorisation or cease providing crypto-asset services. In Luxembourg, the CSSF confirmed that VASP registration under the 2004 AML Law no longer provides a sufficient legal basis for market activity.

EDPB Adopts Final GDPR Guidelines on Blockchain Data Processing, EU, 8 July 2026

On 8 July 2026, the European Data Protection Board adopted the final version of Guidelines 02/2025 on the processing of personal data through blockchain technologies. The guidelines confirm that encrypted and hashed on-chain data remains personal data under the GDPR and that blockchain immutability does not override data subjects' right to erasure under Article 17. Controllers must address architecture choices and data minimisation before any on-chain recording of personal data.