From the journal

MAS Consults on Prudential Treatment of Cryptoassets on Permissionless Blockchains, Singapore, April 2026

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) published Consultation Paper P009-2026 on 17 April 2026, proposing a framework for the prudential treatment of cryptoassets held on permissionless blockchains. The consultation is open until 18 May 2026 at 11:59 PM. The paper addresses the classification of permissionless-blockchain cryptoassets for capital adequacy, credit risk, and liquidity risk purposes under Singapore's banking and financial institution regulations. MAS proposes to allow banks to

3 min read

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) published Consultation Paper P009-2026 on 17 April 2026, proposing a framework for the prudential treatment of cryptoassets held on permissionless blockchains. The consultation is open until 18 May 2026 at 11:59 PM. The paper addresses the classification of permissionless-blockchain cryptoassets for capital adequacy, credit risk, and liquidity risk purposes under Singapore's banking and financial institution regulations.

MAS proposes to allow banks to classify and treat a permissionless cryptoasset as a Group 1 cryptoasset, the more favourable risk category, if the permissionless cryptoasset satisfies a set of principle-based requirements designed to adequately mitigate the risks arising from the characteristics of permissionless blockchains. The baseline framework derives from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's prudential standard for cryptoasset exposures, adopted into Singapore law through MAS's capital adequacy and risk-based capital requirements for banks and merchant banks.

Banks and financial institutions currently authorised or supervised by MAS that hold or plan to hold cryptoassets on permissionless blockchains must assess whether the proposed principles are satisfied for each relevant asset. Institutions that cannot demonstrate satisfaction of those principles would be subject to the more onerous Group 2 treatment, which carries significantly higher risk weights under MAS's capital framework. Custodians, fund managers, and other licensed entities operating under MAS supervision that facilitate access to permissionless cryptoassets may also face consequential adjustments to their regulatory capital, counterparty risk, and liquidity management frameworks.

Stakeholders wishing to respond must submit written comments by 18 May 2026 to MAS at the address specified in the consultation paper. MAS has noted that responses may be published on its website unless confidentiality is requested. The proposal represents MAS's move to harmonise Singapore's prudential treatment of permissionless-blockchain assets with the Basel cryptoasset framework while introducing a principle-based pathway to the more favourable Group 1 classification for qualifying assets.

Our firm advises banks, digital asset businesses, and licensed financial institutions on MAS regulatory compliance, cryptoasset capital adequacy, consultation responses, and Singapore financial licensing. We have a dedicated partner network covering Singapore digital asset regulation. Contact us to discuss the implications of P009-2026: work we undertake includes MAS regulatory submissions, cryptoasset risk classification, capital framework analysis, digital payment token licensing, and DPT compliance structuring.

Source: Monetary Authority of Singapore, Consultation Paper on the Prudential Treatment of Cryptoassets on Permissionless Blockchains, Consultation Number P009-2026, published 17 April 2026, https://www.mas.gov.sg/publications/consultations/2026/consultation-on-the-prudential-treatment-of-cryptoassets-on-permissionless-blockchains (confirmed 3 May 2026).

The information provided is not legal, tax, investment, or accounting advice and should not be used as such. It is for discussion purposes only. Seek guidance from your own legal counsel and advisors on any matters. The views presented are those of the author and not any other individual or organization. Some parts of the text may be automatically generated. The author of this material makes no guarantees or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information.

Crypto Regulatory

More from the journal

See all

European Commission Publishes Draft Guidelines Classifying High-Risk AI Systems Under Article 6, May 2026

On May 19, 2026, the European Commission published draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems under Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (EU AI Act), open for consultation until June 23, 2026. The guidelines interpret key classification concepts and provide worked examples across eight Annex III sectors. The Commission has also postponed Article 6(2) compliance from August 2026 to December 2027 and Article 6(1) from August 2027 to August 2028.

Connecticut Enacts Sweeping AI Law Covering Employment, Healthcare, and Online Safety in June 2026

Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed Senate Bill 5 on June 2, 2026, enacting the Connecticut Artificial Intelligence Responsibility and Transparency Act (CART Act, Public Act 26-15). The law creates disclosure obligations for employers using AI in hiring and layoff decisions, safety protocols for chatbot operators, and content-provenance requirements for large-scale generative AI systems. Compliance deadlines run from October 2026 through January 2028.

New Zealand Online Casino Gambling Regulations 2026 Released, Effective July 2026

New Zealand released the Online Casino Gambling Regulations 2026 in June 2026, made under the Online Casino Gambling Act 2026 (Public Act 2026 No 14). The prohibition on unlicensed online casino gambling applies from 1 July 2026. The Act establishes a three-stage licensing regime for up to 15 operators, administered by the Secretary for Internal Affairs, with age-verification, harm-minimisation, and problem-gambler exclusion obligations.

Ready to launch without the regulatory guesswork?

Book a 30-minute consultation. We'll map your AI or licensing path and tell you exactly what's required, in plain language.