From the journal

MAS Consults on Prudential Treatment of Cryptoassets on Permissionless Blockchains, Singapore, April 2026

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) published Consultation Paper P009-2026 on 17 April 2026, proposing a framework for the prudential treatment of cryptoassets held on permissionless blockchains. The consultation is open until 18 May 2026 at 11:59 PM. The paper addresses the classification of permissionless-blockchain cryptoassets for capital adequacy, credit risk, and liquidity risk purposes under Singapore's banking and financial institution regulations. MAS proposes to allow banks to

3 min read

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) published Consultation Paper P009-2026 on 17 April 2026, proposing a framework for the prudential treatment of cryptoassets held on permissionless blockchains. The consultation is open until 18 May 2026 at 11:59 PM. The paper addresses the classification of permissionless-blockchain cryptoassets for capital adequacy, credit risk, and liquidity risk purposes under Singapore's banking and financial institution regulations.

MAS proposes to allow banks to classify and treat a permissionless cryptoasset as a Group 1 cryptoasset, the more favourable risk category, if the permissionless cryptoasset satisfies a set of principle-based requirements designed to adequately mitigate the risks arising from the characteristics of permissionless blockchains. The baseline framework derives from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's prudential standard for cryptoasset exposures, adopted into Singapore law through MAS's capital adequacy and risk-based capital requirements for banks and merchant banks.

Banks and financial institutions currently authorised or supervised by MAS that hold or plan to hold cryptoassets on permissionless blockchains must assess whether the proposed principles are satisfied for each relevant asset. Institutions that cannot demonstrate satisfaction of those principles would be subject to the more onerous Group 2 treatment, which carries significantly higher risk weights under MAS's capital framework. Custodians, fund managers, and other licensed entities operating under MAS supervision that facilitate access to permissionless cryptoassets may also face consequential adjustments to their regulatory capital, counterparty risk, and liquidity management frameworks.

Stakeholders wishing to respond must submit written comments by 18 May 2026 to MAS at the address specified in the consultation paper. MAS has noted that responses may be published on its website unless confidentiality is requested. The proposal represents MAS's move to harmonise Singapore's prudential treatment of permissionless-blockchain assets with the Basel cryptoasset framework while introducing a principle-based pathway to the more favourable Group 1 classification for qualifying assets.

Our firm advises banks, digital asset businesses, and licensed financial institutions on MAS regulatory compliance, cryptoasset capital adequacy, consultation responses, and Singapore financial licensing. We have a dedicated partner network covering Singapore digital asset regulation. Contact us to discuss the implications of P009-2026: work we undertake includes MAS regulatory submissions, cryptoasset risk classification, capital framework analysis, digital payment token licensing, and DPT compliance structuring.

Source: Monetary Authority of Singapore, Consultation Paper on the Prudential Treatment of Cryptoassets on Permissionless Blockchains, Consultation Number P009-2026, published 17 April 2026, https://www.mas.gov.sg/publications/consultations/2026/consultation-on-the-prudential-treatment-of-cryptoassets-on-permissionless-blockchains (confirmed 3 May 2026).

The information provided is not legal, tax, investment, or accounting advice and should not be used as such. It is for discussion purposes only. Seek guidance from your own legal counsel and advisors on any matters. The views presented are those of the author and not any other individual or organization. Some parts of the text may be automatically generated. The author of this material makes no guarantees or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information.

Crypto Regulatory

More from the journal

See all

Bank of England Publishes Draft Rules for Systemic Stablecoin Issuers

The Bank of England published a policy statement and draft Code of Practice setting out the regulatory regime for systemic stablecoin issuers in the UK in June 2026. The draft rules introduce a GBP 40 billion temporary issuance guardrail per stablecoin, permit issuers to hold up to 70% of reserves in short-term UK government debt, and require the balance in central bank deposits. The consultation closes 22 September 2026; the Bank intends to finalise the Code of Practice by end of 2026.

Connecticut Enacts AI Responsibility and Transparency Act, Effective October 2026

On 2 June 2026, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed Senate Bill 5 into law as Public Act 26-15, the Connecticut Artificial Intelligence Responsibility and Transparency Act. The law creates disclosure obligations for employers using automated employment decision tools, governance requirements for frontier AI developers, product standards for AI companion systems, and safety obligations for online platforms serving minors. Most provisions take effect 1 October 2026; the Attorney General holds exclusive enforcement authority.

EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Obligations Apply from 2 August 2026

Four categories of transparency obligations under Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 become binding on AI system providers and deployers across the EU on 2 August 2026. The European Commission published a final Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content on 10 June 2026 as a voluntary compliance tool, alongside draft guidelines issued on 8 May 2026 that remain under finalisation. AI systems placed on the EU market before the August deadline have until 2 December 2026 to comply with the machine-readable marking obligation in Article 50(2).