From the journal

Italy Council of Ministers Approves AI Implementing Decrees Under Law 132/2025, June 2026

On 10 June 2026, Italy's Council of Ministers approved two draft legislative decrees implementing Law No. 132/2025, Italy's national AI statute that entered into force in October 2025. The first decree covers national supervisory authority powers and AI in education; the second addresses AI in law enforcement, civil liability for AI-caused harm, and new criminal offences. Both decrees are pending parliamentary advisory review before promulgation.

3 min read

Italy's Council of Ministers approved two draft legislative decrees under Law No. 132/2025 on 10 June 2026. Law No. 132/2025 (Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132, titled Disposizioni e deleghe al Governo in materia di intelligenza artificiale) entered into force on 10 October 2025, making Italy the first EU member state to enact a national AI statute aligned with Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. The decrees are the primary delegated legislation needed to operationalise the Law and are now before Parliament for advisory opinion before final promulgation by the President of the Republic.

The first decree implements Articles 31 and 32 of Law 132/2025 on national supervisory authority powers and addresses AI use in educational institutions, requiring schools and universities using AI-assisted decision tools to maintain human oversight and transparency toward students. The second decree addresses AI in law enforcement, setting biometric surveillance restrictions; civil liability for AI-caused damage applied via Article 2050 of the Italian Civil Code (strict liability for dangerous activities); and new criminal offences for intentional misuse of AI systems. Under Article 16 of Law 132/2025, all implementing decrees must be promulgated by 10 October 2026.

AI system providers and deployers operating in Italy must monitor the implementing decrees through the parliamentary advisory process. Employers using AI in recruitment, workforce monitoring, or performance assessment face obligations under the first decree. Law enforcement bodies must review AI surveillance tools against the biometric restrictions in the second decree. Businesses deploying AI systems that cause harm to Italian users may face strict civil liability claims once the second decree takes effect. Professional orders, including lawyers and accountants, must adapt their internal governance regulations within six months of final promulgation.

The decrees remain in draft form and their final text may differ from the Council of Ministers' approved version following parliamentary advisory review. The implementing decrees apply alongside the EU AI Act and its delegated acts and are subject to consistency review to avoid conflict with directly applicable EU law. Companies operating across multiple EU member states should note that Italy's national statute introduces civil and criminal liability provisions that go beyond the EU AI Act's own penalty structure.

Licentium advises businesses operating in Italy on AI law compliance under both Law 132/2025 and the EU AI Act. Contact us to discuss your position. Work we undertake includes Italian AI law compliance gap analysis, implementing decree monitoring and impact assessment, employer AI governance policy drafting, civil and criminal liability risk reviews for AI deployments, and multi-jurisdictional AI regulatory comparison for international businesses across EU member states.

Source: Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Comunicato stampa del Consiglio dei Ministri n. 177, 10 June 2026

AI Regulatory

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

Foreign Ownership of a Delaware or Wyoming Entity: Federal Tax Classification, Information Reporting, Withholding, and State Duties

A non-U.S. person may own a Delaware or Wyoming LLC or a Delaware corporation, yet formation alone does not settle the federal tax result, the reporting burden, confidentiality, or the right to work in the country. This part takes the U.S. entity as chosen and examines classification, Form 5472 reporting, source and effectively connected income, partner and shareholder withholding, tax residence and immigration, duties beyond the formation state, real property and estate exposure, and treaty and home-country dependencies.

Illia Prokopiev

Structuring Cross-Border Digital-Asset Ventures (Part 2)

A cross-border digital-asset group must allocate protocol stewardship, token issuance, customer-facing regulated services, pooled investment, treasury, and founder functions before it selects any jurisdiction. The question presented is where each of those functions can lawfully sit across sixteen jurisdictions and the European Union and EEA overlay, as of 27 August 2026.

Illia Prokopiev

Function-First Entity Design for Cross-Border Digital-Asset Ventures

Cross-border digital-asset ventures often separate several legal roles. Those roles include the venture issuer, operating company, customer-facing licensee, token issuer, pooled vehicle, treasury body, and protocol administrator. The Question Presented is which roles eight jurisdictions can support as of 27 August 2026.