From the journal

Hong Kong SFC and FSTB Conclude VA Advisory and Management Consultation, 26 May 2026

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) of Hong Kong published consultation conclusions on proposed licensing regimes for virtual asset advisory service providers and virtual asset management service providers on 26 May 2026. The regimes are modelled on existing Securities and Futures Ordinance regulated activities and form the final segment of Hong Kong's full virtual asset regulatory architecture under the SFC ASPIRe roadmap.

3 min read

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) of Hong Kong published consultation conclusions on proposed licensing regimes for virtual asset advisory service providers and virtual asset management service providers on 26 May 2026. The consultation received 51 submissions and ran for one month after its launch in December 2025. The conclusions set out the proposed regulatory approach that will advance to legislative drafting and enactment. The proposals form part of the SFC ASPIRe strategic roadmap published on 19 February 2025.

The proposed regime applies the same business, same risks, same rules principle derived from the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571). Virtual asset advisory service providers would require SFC authorisation to provide advice on virtual assets, modelled on Type 4 (advising on securities) and Type 6 (advising on corporate finance) regulated activities under Schedule 5 of the SFO. Virtual asset management service providers would be subject to requirements modelled on Type 9 (asset management) regulated activity conditions, including client asset segregation and portfolio valuation obligations. The advisory regime is technology-neutral.

Entities providing virtual asset portfolio management, investment advice referencing virtual assets, or distribution of virtual asset fund products must assess whether they will require authorisation under the new licensing categories once enacted. Firms already licensed under existing virtual asset trading platform operator or virtual asset fund manager conditions should review whether their current SFC authorisation covers advisory or management activities. Discretionary account managers with virtual asset exposure and fund distributors whose products include digital assets face the most direct licensing obligation under the proposed framework.

The consultation conclusions represent the SFC and FSTB's stated policy position, not enacted law. The timetable for introducing implementing legislation to the Legislative Council has not been confirmed. Transitional and grandfathering provisions for firms informally providing VA advisory or management services are not yet final. Firms should treat the conclusions as a near-term regulatory signal and begin internal readiness assessments rather than waiting for the legislation to be gazetted.

Licentium advises virtual asset businesses on Hong Kong licensing strategy across SFC and FSTB regulated activities. We may be able to assist or identify appropriate support through our partner network. Work we undertake includes VASP licensing under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance, SFC Type 9 VA fund manager authorisation, VA advisory regime readiness assessments, multi-jurisdictional digital asset licensing, and regulatory affairs support for virtual asset market participants in Hong Kong.

Source: SFC and FSTB, Further Public Consultation on Legislative Proposals to Regulate Virtual Asset Advisory and Management Service Providers, consultation conclusions published 26 May 2026

Crypto Regulatory

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

From Cloud Concentration to AI Dependence: The UK’s Critical Third Parties Regime

The United Kingdom now directly oversees designated technology suppliers whose service failures could threaten financial stability. The question is whether the first cloud designations show a legal expansion toward AI-model providers, and what the present regime requires. This analysis assumes the quoted statement concerns the UK financial-services Critical Third Parties regime and assesses the law through 14 July 2026.

Alberta Regulated iGaming Market Launched on 13 July 2026 with 22 Operators

Alberta's regulated private iGaming market launched on 13 July 2026, making Alberta the second Canadian province to permit private online gambling operators after Ontario. The Alberta Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis Commission serves as market regulator and the Alberta iGaming Corporation oversees commercial operations and operator contracts. Twenty-two operator sites went live on day one, including FanDuel, DraftKings, BetMGM, and BetRivers. Operators must fully launch or exit the Alberta market by 13 October 2026.

European Commission Presents Cybersecurity and AI Action Plan on 7 July 2026

On 7 July 2026, the European Commission presented an Action Plan on Cybersecurity and Artificial Intelligence. The plan directs the Commission and ENISA to evaluate advanced AI models before they reach the EU market, establish a secure testing platform for critical-sector organisations, and launch an EU Grand Challenge on AI-powered cybersecurity solutions. It operates alongside the AI Act, NIS2 Directive, DORA, Cyber Resilience Act, and Cyber Solidarity Act, and introduces no new directly binding obligations.