From the journal

European Commission Publishes Draft High-Risk AI Classification Guidelines Under EU AI Act, May 2026

On 19 May 2026, the European Commission published draft guidelines on classifying high-risk AI systems under Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the EU AI Act. The guidelines adopt an expansive interpretation of the high-risk conformity assessment test and are supported by a targeted consultation open until 23 July 2026. The application deadline for Article 6(2) Annex III use cases has been postponed from 2 August 2026 to 2 December 2027.

3 min read

On 19 May 2026, the European Commission published draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems, acting under Article 96(1) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the EU AI Act. The guidelines address both routes to high-risk classification under Article 6: use as a safety component of a product covered by Annex I harmonisation legislation, and inclusion within an Annex III use-case category. A targeted consultation on the draft guidelines runs until 23 July 2026. The Commission expects to adopt final guidelines by the end of 2026.

Article 6(1) of the EU AI Act applies where an AI system serves as a safety component of a product subject to Annex I EU harmonisation legislation, covering medical devices, machinery, civil aviation equipment, and similar regulated products. Article 6(2) applies where an AI system falls within an Annex III category, which includes biometric identification, critical infrastructure management, employment and recruitment decision-support, access to essential services, law enforcement, migration control, and administration of justice. The Commission has postponed the Article 6(2) application deadline from 2 August 2026 to 2 December 2027, and the Article 6(1) deadline from 2 August 2027 to 2 August 2028.

AI system providers, developers, and deployers operating in the EU must assess their systems against the draft criteria to determine whether high-risk conformity obligations apply. The Commission's expansive interpretation means providers of AI systems integrated into regulated products, including medical devices, machinery, and civil aviation equipment, face broader scope than a plain reading of the Act implies. AI deployers in employment, education, banking, and public-sector contexts face classification scrutiny under Annex III. Systems that fall within scope must meet conformity assessment, technical documentation, and human oversight requirements.

The draft guidelines represent the Commission's preliminary position and may shift before final adoption following the targeted consultation. Providers whose systems sit on the borderline of Annex III categories should submit responses to the consultation before 23 July 2026 to influence the final classification criteria. Providers should also monitor whether their national market surveillance authority interprets the draft expansively or narrowly, as implementation may vary across member states before the Commission finalises its position.

Licentium advises AI developers and deployers on EU AI Act compliance obligations, including high-risk classification analysis, conformity assessment preparation, and technical documentation review. Our team and partner network are available to assist organisations reviewing AI system portfolios ahead of the December 2027 Article 6(2) deadline. Work we undertake includes EU AI Act classification assessments, targeted consultation submissions, conformity assessment support, and advice on harmonised standards applicable to high-risk AI systems.

Source: European Commission, Draft Commission Guidelines on the Classification of High-Risk AI Systems under the EU AI Act, Article 96(1) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, 19 May 2026

AI Regulatory

More from the journal

See all

FSB Issues Consultation on Sound Practices for Responsible AI Adoption in Finance, June 2026

On 10 June 2026, the Financial Stability Board published a consultation report identifying 12 sound practices for responsible AI adoption by financial institutions. The practices cover organisation-wide AI governance and AI lifecycle management at the use-case level. The FSB explicitly acknowledges the limits of human oversight of agentic AI systems and recommends AI-monitoring-AI architectures. Comments are due 22 July 2026, with a final report expected in October 2026.

New Zealand Online Casino Gambling Regulations 2026 Take Effect 3 July, Regulating Licensed Operators

The Online Casino Gambling Regulations 2026 (NZ) come into force on 3 July 2026, setting operational and advertising requirements for up to 15 licensed online casino operators under the Online Casino Gambling Act 2026. Key requirements include mandatory spending limit prompts, a prohibition on credit card payments, a 3.5% quarterly levy on gambling profits, bans on autoplay functions, and restrictions on affiliate marketing targeting specific audiences.

Vietnam Implements AI Law Risk Classification Rules Via Decree 142, Effective May 2026

On 30 April 2026, Vietnam's government issued Decree No. 142/2026/ND-CP implementing the Law on Artificial Intelligence, effective 1 May 2026. The Decree establishes a three-tier AI risk classification system, mandatory labelling of AI-generated content, and incident-reporting timelines of 72 hours for serious incidents. The Decree applies to foreign organisations and individuals conducting AI activities in Vietnam, regardless of where they are incorporated.

Ready to launch without the regulatory guesswork?

Book a 30-minute consultation. We'll map your AI or licensing path and tell you exactly what's required, in plain language.