From the journal

European Commission Publishes Draft Guidelines on High-Risk AI System Classification, 19 May 2026

The European Commission published draft guidelines on 19 May 2026 on classifying AI systems as high-risk under Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. The guidelines are open for targeted consultation until 23 June 2026. They are not legally binding but represent the Commission's interpretive position and will guide market surveillance authorities in enforcement.

3 min read

The European Commission published draft guidelines on 19 May 2026 on the classification of high-risk AI systems under Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Publication follows an obligation under Article 96 of the AI Act, which required the Commission to issue classification guidelines no later than two years after the regulation entered into force. A targeted consultation is open until 23 June 2026; the Commission intends to incorporate feedback before adopting the final guidelines.

Article 6 establishes two separate pathways to high-risk classification. Under Article 6(1), an AI system is high-risk if it serves as a safety component of an Annex I product, or is itself such a product, and the product requires third-party conformity assessment under the relevant EU harmonisation legislation. Under Article 6(2), an AI system is high-risk if it falls within one of the use-case areas listed in Annex III, covering eight domains: biometric identification, critical infrastructure management, education, employment, access to essential private and public services, law enforcement, migration management, and administration of justice. The draft guidelines confirm that the classification is use-specific: the same AI system may be high-risk in one deployment and not in another.

Providers deploying AI systems in the Annex III domains must determine, per the draft guidelines, whether the specific use case within those domains meets the classification threshold. Providers of employment screening tools, banks using AI in credit decisions, AI deployers in healthcare, and operators of educational assessment platforms all face direct impact if a system meets the classification criteria. Those that conclude a system is not high-risk under Article 6(2) must document that determination and make it available to market surveillance authorities on request.

The draft guidelines acknowledge that an AI system performing only a narrow procedural task, or reproducing a previously human-made decision without adding a substantive new assessment, may fall outside the high-risk classification if it does not materially influence the consequential outcome. The Commission notes this determination is fact-specific and depends on the actual role the system plays in the decision chain. Application of Article 6(2) is now delayed until 2 December 2027 under the Digital Omnibus agreement of 7 May 2026, giving providers time to align their classification processes with the final guidelines before obligations apply.

Licentium assists clients in AI system classification analysis, preparation of Article 6(2) self-assessment documentation, and engagement with market surveillance authorities. Our team advises AI providers and deployers across the EU on conformity obligations. Work we undertake includes EU AI Act classification advice, provider and deployer obligation mapping, high-risk AI conformity assessment preparation, and technical documentation review.

Source: European Commission, Draft Commission Guidelines on the Classification of High-Risk AI Systems under Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, 19 May 2026

AI Regulatory

More from the journal

See all

Colorado Enacts SB 26-189 Replacing Prior AI Consumer Rules with Automated Decision-Making Technology Obligations, 2026

Colorado SB 26-189, the Automated Decision-Making Technology Act, repeals and replaces the consumer AI protections in SB 24-205, establishing new obligations for developers and deployers of covered automated decision-making technology in consequential decisions. Developer obligations take effect 1 January 2027. Violations constitute deceptive trade practices under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, enforceable by the Attorney General.

UK Designates 18 Cryptocurrency Exchanges Under Russia Sanctions Regulations, 26 May 2026

On 26 May 2026, the UK designated 18 cryptocurrency exchanges under The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, including Huobi Global S.A., operator of HTX, and three Georgian Russia-focused exchanges. OFSI confirmed HTX is subject to UK financial sanctions by reason of Huobi's ownership. The action marks the first time the UK has directly sanctioned cryptocurrency exchanges in connection with Russian sanctions evasion.

European Commission Opens Consultation on Draft Guidelines for High-Risk AI System Classification Under Article 6, June 2026

The European Commission has published draft guidelines clarifying when an AI system qualifies as high-risk under Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). A targeted consultation is open until 23 June 2026. The guidelines are not legally binding but reflect the Commission's interpretation and will guide market surveillance authorities and AI providers in applying the high-risk classification rules.

Ready to launch without the regulatory guesswork?

Book a 30-minute consultation. We'll map your AI or licensing path and tell you exactly what's required, in plain language.