From the journal

Senate Banking Committee advances Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act, 14 May 2026

On 14 May 2026 the United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs voted 15 to 9 to advance the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act. The bill divides supervisory authority over digital assets between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, addresses spot market trading, and creates registration categories for digital commodity exchanges, brokers, and dealers.

3 min read

The Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee approved the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act on 14 May 2026 by a 15 to 9 vote. The bill advances to the full Senate. The House companion, H.R. 3633, already passed the House.

The bill divides supervisory authority. Digital commodities fall under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Digital asset securities fall under the Securities and Exchange Commission. New statutory definitions cover digital commodity, permitted payment stablecoin, and mature blockchain system. The bill creates registration categories for digital commodity exchanges, brokers, and dealers, and amends Section 4 of the Commodity Exchange Act, Section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Section 3(a) of the Securities Act of 1933. The Committee's section-by-section summary details the allocation of rulemaking and enforcement authority between the two agencies.

Centralised exchanges, custodians, broker-dealers, and stablecoin issuers gain a clearer path to register with either the CFTC or the SEC. Decentralised protocols receive defined exemptions tied to the mature blockchain system test. Banks and trust companies considering custody of digital commodities should plan around revised capital and risk treatment. Token issuers with secondary-market trading should reassess whether their tokens qualify as digital commodities or remain securities.

Outstanding issues include illicit-finance controls, ethics provisions addressing public officials profiting from digital assets, and the treatment of anti-money-laundering obligations for non-custodial software developers. Senators Gallego and Alsobrooks joined committee Republicans to provide bipartisan support. Senate floor scheduling and conference negotiations with the House bill remain to be confirmed.

Licentium advises token issuers, exchanges, brokers, custodians, and stablecoin issuers on United States market structure reform, registration paths, and transitional planning, and coordinates counsel admitted before the SEC, CFTC, and federal banking regulators where needed. Contact us to scope a US market structure programme. Work we undertake includes token classification memoranda, broker-dealer registration, CFTC FCM and DCM compliance, stablecoin issuance opinions, and AML programme design.

Source: US Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, Section-by-Section summary, https://www.banking.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/section-by-section.pdf, committee vote 14 May 2026, confirmed 15 May 2026.

The information provided is not legal, tax, investment, or accounting advice and should not be used as such. It is for discussion purposes only. Seek guidance from your own legal counsel and advisors on any matters. The views presented are those of the author and not any other individual or organization. Some parts of the text may be automatically generated. The author of this material makes no guarantees or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information.

Crypto Regulatory

More from the journal

See all
Illia Prokopiev

MLR Registration and the FCA Cryptoasset Gateway to 25 October 2027

This matter concerns the transition of a United Kingdom cryptoasset business from FCA registration under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 to Part 4A permission under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. The question is whether MLR registration gives conversion, grandfathering, priority, or a right to continue after 25 October 2027, and what an affected firm should do before the gateway closes. This analysis assumes an existing UK-facing cryptoasset business, no relevant Part 4A permission, and an intention to continue after commencement.

Illia Prokopiev

ESMA's 2026 Custody Resilience CSA and the Rules That Actually Bind

ESMA’s 2026 Common Supervisory Action is a coordinated national review of digital operational resilience in crypto-asset custody. It will test whether selected crypto-asset service providers can demonstrate effective controls across six announced workstreams. The legal questions are which requirements are binding, how national competent authorities may assess control effectiveness, and what consequences may follow from a deficiency. This analysis assumes that the firm is permitted under MiCA Article 59 to provide custody and administration within Article 3(1)(17).

Illia Prokopiev

Stablecoin regulation in the US, Hong Kong and Singapore

Stablecoin and digital-token regulation now combines market-entry authorization with continuous financial-crime controls in daily operations. The question is whether the United States’ proposed payment-stablecoin customer identification program, Hong Kong’s narrow first licensing round, and Singapore’s digital payment token (DPT) directory support a bank-like compliance characterization. They do, with material limits. The more accurate proposition is that compliance is moving beyond approval into continuous financial-institution-grade operations.